I have a vacation house in South of France (it's going to be sold, but that's another story).
The community where it is located has ZERO fiber access. Nothing planned in near future.
Only solution: copper or 3G/4G-modem (and even that last option is shaky, rural in France sometimes really means "the middle of nowhere").
It will be a LOOOONNG time before in such places copper will be completely abandoned.
My view.
So looking at RB962UiGS-5HacT2HnT specs I see no reason why it could not provide WPA3. Any reason why Mikrotik sticks to WPA2 and are there plan to migrate to WPA3 for all APs?
Specifications for that device do not mention anything about WPA3 being supported on HW level so I do not understand how you make that assumption that it should.
Did some proper checking.
On the technical specs for the Wifi-chip used on that device (QCA9880), there is no mentioning of WPA3.
I could not find ANY device from whatever vendor having that chip AND WPA3 capability.
Maybe there is but I could not find it.
So it's not only MikroTik holding back that feature, it seems ?
That chip is simply not capable of handling it as far as I can tell.
So the device where that chip is being used as Wifi driver, is not either.
Makes perfect sense, no ?