Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
jnob
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2022 6:28 pm

routing table issues after upgrade to 7.5

Sun Sep 25, 2022 6:56 pm

Hi,
I recently upgraded from the last stable RouterOS v6 version to 7.5.
Some of my static routes were disabled as not valid.
Before I start trying to debug and ask for specific help I would first like to understand the different suffixes that were added to my routes in the upgrade process: namely ^1 and ^1024 in dst address and @1 on my gw addr

thanks,
Jon
gkrellShoot_09-25-22_175331.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Sob
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 9119
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: routing table issues after upgrade to 7.5

Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:04 am

It's related to different routing tables. RouterOS v6 had it like this:
/ip route
add dst-address=x.x.x.x/x gateway=y.y.y.y routing-mark=tablename
Current v7 uses:
/ip route
add dst-address=x.x.x.x/x gateway=y.y.y.y routing-table=tablename
But in early v7 they had horrible idea to use this:
/ip route
add dst-address=x.x.x.x/x^tablename gateway=y.y.y.y
Luckily it was scrapped, but as you discovered, it partially survived in WebFig. It's a display bug, there should be separate column for routing table name, as is in WinBox. But since WebFig generally seems to have low priority, they didn't fix it there yet. The @1 is something similar, it's a valid config if gateway is in another routing table, but unless you have routing table named "1", it's probably also some display bug.

You should send a bug report to get it fixed: https://mikrotik.com/support
 
jnob
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2022 6:28 pm

Re: routing table issues after upgrade to 7.5

Mon Sep 26, 2022 3:11 pm

Thanks for the reply. Bug filed. In the meantime I will "drop down" to the CLI for more investigation. :)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: itsbenlol, mstanciu, NetTecture, tarfox and 42 guests