Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
killersoft
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Victoria, Australia

MACSec beta3

Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:30 pm

Hi.
I am testing out MACSec(beta 3) on a RB951G-2HnD & RB750G, but cannot seem to get the two mikrotik units past "negotiating".
I'm using the same cak and ckn values between the units, and the ethernets are of course connected together.
I'm using the same code(different interface names between the units !!
/interface macsec profile
set [ find default-name=default ] name=default server-priority=10
/interface macsec
add cak=228ef255aa23ff6729ee664acb66e91f ckn=\
    37c9c2c45ddd012aa5bc8ef284aa23ff6729ee2e4acb66e91fe34ba2cd9fe311 disabled=\
    no interface=eth5_3_macsec name=macsec1 profile=default
Any idea's on this ?
macsec_try.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Njumaen
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:41 pm
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
Contact:

Re: MACSec beta3

Sat Nov 16, 2019 4:52 pm

Can't wait for running macsec! :-)

I've go the same issue with hEX PoE / hAP ac^2
 
User avatar
nichky
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1275
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 2:35 pm

Re: MACSec beta3

Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:54 am

it does work on v7.6

i thought that i can do for the bridged ports , but that is not allowed yet.

One funny thing ,
not sure why MACSec has allowed to put in the bridge/port

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests