Upgrading the OLD NS5loco to Cube 60Pro Ac for the better and high throughput performance. Nice to have like this kind of cpe which is not expensive yet reliable on the performance.
Kudos to Mikrotik Team.
Agreed!! But of course it depend always on the Deployment and requirements needed ...They work and don't lockup like Ubiquiti 60Ghz stuff
ON THE PRODUCT PAGE....Please check the Mikrotik product page, there is ROS Levels.
Could I find anywhere angles for 60G device?
@rextended, any chance you know what "SA" stands for ?11° (+/- 5,5°) the non-SA and 60° (+/-30°) the SA
(is this a serious question or a joke? )@rextended, any chance you know what "SA" stands for ?
60° / 2 = (-)30° & (+)30°Also i can't find in the manual the +/- 5,5° and the +/-30°, so what do you mean by that ?
SA mean Sector Antenna
SA, has many meanings. South Africa comes to mind and having a military background SA, means Situational Awareness.(is this a serious question or a joke? )@rextended, any chance you know what "SA" stands for ?
SA mean Sector Antenna
60° / 2 = (-)30° & (+)30°Also i can't find in the manual the +/- 5,5° and the +/-30°, so what do you mean by that ?
I mean that you can go left by (-)30° and right by (+)30° and 0° is where the antenna is centered / directed / pointed (sorry for my english).
Is why sector antenna have 60° coverage.
https://mikrotik.com/product/cubesa_60pro_ac
You notice that this model do not have the "deflector"?
Instead the "client" antenna have only +/-5,5° because is directive (and wider angle is useless because lost gain, and can be subject of more interfecrencies)
https://mikrotik.com/product/cube_60pro_ac
You notice the "deflector" that narrowing the beam?
yesso it has ROS Level 4???
Hi,As ptp, for me, is an error on specification that support l4, better if you contact support@mikrotik.com
@Bruzxce please, can you check the exact model (system / routerboard) you have and the license level (systel / license)?
Thanks.
A backup for what exactly? listening to an internet radio station? Because it isn't a backup for customer data. That would imply its actually useful which it isn't5GHz interface is designed as backup for 0.001% of time when main 60GHz interface is unavailable. it's not designed as Access point for other wireless clients or other uses.
New interface bonding, diferent modesHow is the 5GHz backup failover implemented ?
I mean what triggers the switch on the 5 GHz in terms of configuration ? Any type of bonding etc. ?
Absolute agreement. In order for the backup to be somewhat usable, it must be dualchain and have a signal of around -55db at 2.5km. 5Ghz singlechain and signal -70db is unusable as backup.A backup for what exactly? listening to an internet radio station? Because it isn't a backup for customer data. That would imply its actually useful which it isn't5GHz interface is designed as backup for 0.001% of time when main 60GHz interface is unavailable. it's not designed as Access point for other wireless clients or other uses.
I don't think anyone expects it to perform like you're suggesting, but it has to have enough capability to function as a backup data path (at lower data rates, sure) which is the desired and intended purpose
As it currently is the signal is so weak it will not likely not even establish in an urban environment at the edges of useful 60ghz ranges (where the 60ghz is likely to go....) there's no SNR margin at -70db and single chain is woeful
Hence would have been better to not even include it and save some on the cost. Or advertise it as 'backup console cable over the air' because thats about all its realistically useful for. It definitely will not be even remotely usable at the claimed 2.5km
Better yet increase the cost and also offer dual chain high gain 5ghz to extend the radio's useful range to the full 2.5km. If it was achieving -55db on dual chain at that range on dual chain so that its fast 99.9% of the time but still quite useable during those rainy periods, i'd happily pay a 50% premium or more
Maybe it would perform reasonable at 200 metres, but the thing is...
You need the 5ghz at range or adverse conditions - where its not currently useful
You don't need it at short range in perfect conditions - because the 60ghz will not drop anyway
Do you see how the logic does not compute?
What do you mean by New interface bonding ?New interface bonding, diferent modes
/system health print
No Details at all.. I already tried it before..Hi!
Could anyone using Cube 60Pro AC check if there is voltage information under?Code: Select all/system health print
Since I upgrade my NSloco to 60Pro Ac (950meter LOS) of miktrotik I didn't encounter any issue at all as i use it for PTP not PTMP set-up and on my area where am I the rain come very seldom and if its rain just a couple of minutes that's why I choose Cube 60pro. I'm using also the Old Cube 60G (350meter LOS) and since i deploy it almost a 1yr only one time that I encounter an issue and it was user error.Right now I have 5Ghz link. I plan to _UPGRADE_ them to 60Ghz to get better speed when weather is good and understand that 60Ghz does not work good under heavy rain.
That product advertise that it will failover to 5ghz when weather is bad. THAT IS GREAT !!!
What it is expected is that it will perform juste like 5Ghz device under heavy rain.
Then you stumble on that kind of post that should be at least "fine printed" somwhere on the spec...
Mikrotik you know what ? Never less the cost of a device, when it does not do the job, it is always too expensive.
I'll pass for now and keep all my old nanobeam-ac-gen2 that perform just great for 5ghz device.