No, only CRS3xx series, like the article says.CRS125 also will bee bootable in dual boot?? RouterOS and SWos??
Now this is a step fitting for 2017. Congratulations!if you really like to fit the design with the
environment, we are providing 3D printer
friendly design files
I think, there is no serial port on this deviceAlso, can someone confirm, whether or not, the CR326 has a console port?
Since this is a SwOS device it has no console support.Also, can someone confirm, whether or not, the CR326 has a console port?
Why it's written in product specification?So why would it need a console port?
I don't see any reference to a RJ45 console port in the description.Serial port RJ45 https://routerboard.com/CSS326-24G-2SplusRM
It was there, but now it's gone - it seems they corrected it.I don't see any reference to a RJ45 console port in the description.Serial port RJ45 https://routerboard.com/CSS326-24G-2SplusRM
If it was there, it is corrected by now.
We will have a WAP LTE Kit this year.Need a home AP LTE device
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
It's niceWe will have a WAP LTE Kit this year.Need a home AP LTE device
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
me too, I was hoping for at new CRS226 with at least a 600mhz processor, because the 400Mhz processor is using 50% cpu now, and sometimes it hits 100% and then I loose the ping to the switch, I have about 100 of these switches, and need about 200 more, but holding on to see if they would upgrade the processor to a faster one, and maybe even an 48 port version of itI'm so excited about the coming CRS326-24G-2S+! Would you mind to share us some specs? I hope for a stronger CPU and an all POE version.
[/list]
mikrotik never replied us
Rackmounted device with external China-grade power adapter! Shame on MT! Really unserious approach and (as a result) look! Why not add one or (better) two PS like CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ has?- new SwOS powered 24-port switch CSS326-24G-2S+RM, $139
In my tests, these percents are for lcd graphs. If you disable LCD - you'll immediately recover that extra CPU cycles....crs226, only as switch, and they use sround 8-9% cpu
Why not add one or (better) two PS like CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ has?
ok I tried to disable the lcd interface, and that reduced the cpu % with about 30%.In my tests, these percents are for lcd graphs. If you disable LCD - you'll immediately recover that extra CPU cycles....crs226, only as switch, and they use sround 8-9% cpu
Strange to know that CPU is so weak (or maybe code is so bad) that even cycled display simple statistics results in such a big CPU spending. If I run SNMP stats gathering or even accounting or simple gather stats via API calls from outside I see much lower CPU percents spent to get the same info that on LCD graphs.
The new CRS3xx series will have a much more poweful 800MHz Marvell CPU, even better than the CRS125I also have about 10 of these CRS125-24G-1S-RM and they are configured exactly as the crs226, only as switch, and they use sround 8-9% cpu, thats why i think the 226 woyld benefit from the same processor as the crs125
If there is a chance, that new CSS will not be affected by this bug\issue - http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=111069 ?The new CRS3xx series will have a much more poweful 800MHz Marvell CPU, even better than the CRS125I also have about 10 of these CRS125-24G-1S-RM and they are configured exactly as the crs226, only as switch, and they use sround 8-9% cpu, thats why i think the 226 woyld benefit from the same processor as the crs125
This reply was about CPU as i understand.Like I said, CSS3xx has a new Marvell DX chip. Completely different system and different feature set.
We talk about switches, not multicore router, right?It will no longer cost 130USD then. For better PSU, you should choose a CCR like you pointed out.Code: Select allWhy not add one or (better) two PS like CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ has?
I'm happy never get that cheaper versions where cpu is 400 mhz but i think it should be only 33% difference in cpu power (600 vs 400 mhz) and in a real life even less margin. But as I read your post I really start to affraid of MT cpus, what is the stuff they put in it?ok I tried to disable the lcd interface, and that reduced the cpu % with about 30%.
I hope you do understand what the difference is between switch and router, and that CPU is in these switches mainly for management purposes and is not in any way involved in the actual L2 switching. Don't you?I really start to affraid of MT cpus, what is the stuff they put in it?
Mt ROS based switches looking like handle storms by CPU, this may be the reason?
so if I order the CSS326-24G-2S+RM it will basically do the same as the CRS226 as a switch only, but with 800Mhz?The new CRS3xx series will have a much more poweful 800MHz Marvell CPU, even better than the CRS125I also have about 10 of these CRS125-24G-1S-RM and they are configured exactly as the crs226, only as switch, and they use sround 8-9% cpu, thats why i think the 226 woyld benefit from the same processor as the crs125
I only need it for switching, and dont ned the lcd, what about 48 ports?CSS has a different OS and does not support LCD. It only has SwOS on it, so there are no optional routing capabilities like in the CRS.
Frankly speaking, it's hard to see you roadmap, so every new announcement is kind of surprise. This is funny, but it's hard to plan. Uniform way of control (SNMP or API) is a must, too, for a big network.When we have new products to show, we will announce them in a newsletter like this
From what I've learn about MT hardware so far, MT won't target to enterprise market, and I don't even know what market they try to feed.I don't know of any ''serious" switch that does not support
WAP LTE Lit: Already scheduled for release?We will have a WAP LTE Kit this year.Need a home AP LTE device
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
I don't think the amount of RAM is the problem here. But CPU arch very likely is.Btw, what it takes to add normal RAM amount to this new switches to allow both ROS and SwOS be choosen?
Hardly believe MT can not afford to put any decent CPU into this switch. I only suspect they wouldn't like to cut sales of other (more powerful) models.I don't think the amount of RAM is the problem here. But CPU arch very likely is.Btw, what it takes to add normal RAM amount to this new switches to allow both ROS and SwOS be choosen?
It's likely the switch chip they put into this device already has some CPU capable of running some lightweight management interface.Hardly believe MT can not afford to put any decent CPU into this switch.
This is the key. Putting another (more powerful) CPU in addition to what's already inside will make device more expensive.for small money.
Adding built-in power supply won't rise the price to the sky but will definitely makes it easy to install 10s of such devices in one rack.Putting another (more powerful) CPU in addition to what's already inside will make device more expensive.
It's likely the switch chip they put into this device already has some CPU capable of running some lightweight management interface.Hardly believe MT can not afford to put any decent CPU into this switch.
This is the key. Putting another (more powerful) CPU in addition to what's already inside will make device more expensive.for small money.
I was talking about CPU, not PSU...Adding built-in power supply...
I got that, my point was that for any kind of rack-mount hardware it may be better to have good PSU and decent CPU and RAM so this device can be relied upon. I had some trouble mounting about ten of such a switches in a single rack since I got manage to connect these external cheap PSUs in a respective PDU.I was talking about CPU, not PSU...
Look this:!!WAP LTE Lit: Already scheduled for release?We will have a WAP LTE Kit this year.Need a home AP LTE device
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
Why do you call it incomplete?https://routerboard.com/RBwAPR-2nD
The bad thing is that it is incomplete.
I guess juliokato called it incomplete because it is meant to be used as an LTE client, has LTE antennas builtin, but does not have LTE card installed/soldered, so you have to purchase it separately (there's a miniPCI-e slot for that). Having said that, this kind of "incompleteness" has its advantages, you can choose a decently priced card that supports the band you need.Why do you call it incomplete?