I haven't been able to find anything about this, so perhaps I'm the first to ask, but I greatly prefer the CRS3xx over the CRS1xx series as they act more like traditional switches for VLANs where it's handled in a more integrated fashion and not through an odd combination of the switch/bridge menu. I realize some of those issues were resolved in ROS software updates, but it appears there are just limitations of the 1xx switch chip with respect to VLANs in hardware that prevent it from fully competing with the basic feature set of most 1U switches from the last decade or so. Not complaining as I realize there's a cost to keeping prices down, but the 3xx seemed to solve my last major issues so since that's done I'm now making this miniaturization request/query. Anyways, not looking to debate this a ton, just saying 3xx series is better for me.
I need the smaller form factor of the -IN model for the in-wall equipment cabinets found in most homes (at least in my experience in mid/high-end homes in the US)... like the Leviton one linked below (pic attached for posterity), in which it is very difficult to fit even the smallest 24-port rackmount switch (MT/Cisco/etc, doesn't matter) with any space left over for other equipment, which I usually need, like POETexas injectors, power bricks for other gear, power strips, etc. The CRS125...-IN is what I use now and it's a good size... has room around it for cooling and some slim other stuff if need be (power bricks/etc) and fits right in the center of the top usually, facing down for easy access plus the screen is accessible (not as worried about having a screen, but it's a nice touch for this mounting arrangement.
Current link to article with sample pics (same as attached): https://digitized.house/future-proofing ... omponents/
Which is all a long way of saying, are there plans for a CRS3xx (or its successor) coming to a -IN form factor within an inch or two of the CRS125...-IN model, roughly speaking (slightly wider is better than slightly deeper for my application, if changes had to be made to accommodate the 3xx board)?