I noticed a regression between the 6.46.1 (which was the previous version installed on my router) and 7.0beta4. It's the first time I try 7.0.
The router is a rb2011.
I have several black hole routes for the private IP address ranges which I use with rpf to avoid spoofing. Using /ip route print doesn't show the blackhole routes as "blackhole". They appear as Active Static ones, which is wrong.
This is a route print from a rb2011 with 6.46.1
The same configuration on rb2011 with 7.0beta4
/ip route> print where type=blackhole Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, m - mme, B - blackhole, U - unreachable, P - prohibit # DST-ADDRESS PREF-SRC GATEWAY DISTANCE 0 A SB 10.0.0.0/8 1 1 A SB 169.254.0.0/16 1 2 A SB 172.16.0.0/12 1 3 A SB 192.168.0.0/16 1
While the routes were added like:
/ip/route> print where type=blackhole Flags: X - disabled, I - inactive, A - active; C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, d - dhcp, v - vpn Columns: DST-ADDRESS, Distance # DST-ADDRESS D 0 AS 10.0.0.0/8 1 1 AS 169.254.0.0/16 1 2 AS 172.16.0.0/12 1 3 AS 192.168.0.0/16 1 [admin@MikroTik] /ip/route>
/ip route add dst-address=169.254.0.0/16 type=blackhole add dst-address=172.16.0.0/12 type=blackhole add dst-address=192.168.0.0/16 type=blackhole add dst-address=10.0.0.0/8 type=blackhole