Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020
 
go626201
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2019 11:52 am

Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Jan 19, 2020 4:19 pm

Wireguard had been widely use by a lot of system. Speed Fast and stable for the vpn tunnel usage.
Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 Warp also using Wireguard as the tunnel for the argo tunnel.
 
alfredo
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:06 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Mon Jan 20, 2020 8:45 am

+1 for WireGuard. This thing is fast! Also, much easier to deploy than OpenVPN.
 
dnordenberg
newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:00 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Mon Jan 20, 2020 7:03 pm

Would be really nice, bringing in some a fresh modern feeling and options...
Unfortunately to take full advantage of it you need a 5.6 kernel :(
Routeros 7 is on 4.14 as this is a super long LTS kernel. Wireguard just missed the 5.5 which is expected to be the next super long LTS kernel so for routeros we probably have to wait for the next super long LTS which include WG and that would probably be like 5.13-14 in 2 years :( And even after that it will probably take a while for mikrotik to adopt the new LTS kernel, they just adopted 4.14 which is already 2 years old so looking back it could be at least 2+2 years before we even see a WG kernel in routeros. If mikrotik don't decide to use the compat WG instead which could run on legacy kernels. I have no idea what the backside is of doing that instead of using a kernel with built in WG support...
 
Sob
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5143
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:49 am

If I understand it correctly, "compat" version of WG are simply backports to older kernels, so there shouldn't be any problem. Call me an optimist, but if WG continues to get popular, and if other things with RouterOS 7 go well, I believe that we can see WG in RouterOS before Christmas (yes, this year, but no, I probably wouldn't bet on it, my optimism has some limits ;)).
People who quote full posts should be spanked with ethernet cable. Some exceptions for multi-topic threads may apply. Not intended as incentive for masochists.
 
User avatar
eworm
Member
Member
Posts: 473
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:23 am
Location: Oberhausen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Tue Jan 21, 2020 1:31 pm

The compat version (https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux-compat/) is the same as what goes into Linux 5.6, it's just the out-of-tree repository.
Manage RouterOS scripts and extend your devices' functionality: RouterOS Scripts
 
joda58
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:48 pm

+1 for WireGuard.

Other routers are beginning to deliver...
I don't want to switch supplier.

/joda
 
go626201
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2019 11:52 am

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Wed Jan 22, 2020 7:39 pm

Hopefully ROS7 will include Wireguard within this year. :lol:
 
Wublide
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:00 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Wed Jan 22, 2020 8:57 pm

it would be a dream because now i have a routerboard+raspberry(wireguard) for every single sites of my fullmesh vpn
 
Mulat
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 4:50 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sat Jan 25, 2020 1:50 pm

+1 for WireGuard.
 
User avatar
mozerd
Member
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sat Jan 25, 2020 3:25 pm

it would be a dream because now i have a routerboard+raspberry(wireguard) for every single sites of my fullmesh vpn
Yes absolutely !!!
Dream along with me I am on the way to the STARS
 
User avatar
floaty
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2018 1:24 am
Location: 52°08'32.34"N 14°39'05.0"E

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:38 pm

I'm in.
+1 for WireGuard.
~~
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
 
erkexzcx
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 11:42 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Jan 26, 2020 11:48 am

+1. I also do have additional SBC next to Mikrotik router just for Wireguard VPN server.
 
User avatar
DmitryAVET
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:27 am
Location: Ukraine, Mukachevo
Contact:

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:58 pm

+1 for Wireguard https://www.wireguard.com/

MikroTik don't ignore us...

Keenetic allready have support WireGuard
https://help.keenetic.com/hc/ru/article ... eGuard-VPN
 
EchelonCA
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 4:54 am

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Tue Jan 28, 2020 6:00 pm

+1. The versatility that comes with wireguard, especially with roaming connections (i.e. swapping back and forth between mobile and wireless) is extremely useful, as well as the increased throughput provided by wireguard. It would be perfect to roll this in with rOS vs. having a separate appliance just to provide this functionality.
 
User avatar
eworm
Member
Member
Posts: 473
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:23 am
Location: Oberhausen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:43 am

Linus just pulled the net-next branch from David Miller, thus Wireguard is now upstream:
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next
Manage RouterOS scripts and extend your devices' functionality: RouterOS Scripts
 
User avatar
osc86
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:15 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Wed Jan 29, 2020 6:12 pm

I really would like to have Wireguard Support in V7.
CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ ROS6.45.7
 
User avatar
rooted
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:58 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:02 pm

+1 for wireguard, the performance can't be denied.
 
rooneybuk
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Wed Feb 05, 2020 11:12 am

+1 for WireGuard.

I believe this is a must going forward for RouterOS 7 its is become a major player in the VPN space
 
ahtoh
just joined
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:10 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Wed Feb 05, 2020 11:26 pm

Just bought another brand because Mikrotik is missing this feature.
https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-mv1000/
 
th0massin0
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 4:16 am
Location: Poland

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Fri Feb 07, 2020 2:46 pm

It would be more than great if we get only one tcp or udp vpn that using certs for encryption, service port could be changed and have windows client (may be third-party).
 
syadnom
Member
Member
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:29 am

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sat Feb 15, 2020 1:12 am

just another vote for the fantastic wireguard kit..
 
User avatar
omidkosari
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 629
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: Iran , Karaj
Contact:

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:13 am

+1 for wireguard .
Please don't repeat the way you did with OpenVPN udp
MTCNA , MTCRE, MTCWE, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 
User avatar
rooted
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:58 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Feb 16, 2020 5:41 am

+1 for wireguard .
Please don't repeat the way you did with OpenVPN udp
Wireguard is very simple compared to Ovpn, if I'm not mistaken it's only around 4000 lines of code.
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:09 pm

He was writing OpenVPN UDP support by Mikrotik and not about OpenVPN itself.

A good alternative for now is IKEv2, in the time waiting for Wireguard being implemented by Mikrotik.
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.47.beta.x / Winbox 3.21 / MikroTik APP 1.3.10
Android device owners, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
User avatar
rooted
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:58 pm

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Feb 16, 2020 8:14 pm

@msatter I know what he meant I should have been more clear about what I was trying to say, the reason Ovpn went the way it did is because MikroTik wrote their own implementation. With over a million lines of code in the open source implementation you can see how this would be an issue, but with the simplicity of wireguard even if they rewrite there should be no compatability issues.
 
fflo
just joined
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2019 7:59 am

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:51 pm

Implementation of something like https://github.com/burghardt/easy-wg-quick would be awesome.

This would allow secure and fast VPN client configuration using a simple QR code to scan.
 
mada3k
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 10:53 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Sun Feb 23, 2020 9:27 pm

Personally, I think that Wireguard is a bit of a joke, since it's hardcoded to use ChaCha20. So basiclly all systems with AES in hardware becomes useless and has to do it in software. Great work there.

But what about low-end PC's some said? Well... My Celeron N3150 ITX has AES-NI...

So bye bye all hardware offload.

https://www.wireguard.com/protocol/
https://www.reddit.com/r/WireGuard/comm ... use_aesni/

But I have to give it that looks really simple & nice to setup.
Manages some CCR's, RB750Gr3, RB922 and wAP's

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: realtime and 14 guests