Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
andrewe02000
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:33 am
Location: Canton, OH
Contact:

Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:39 pm

Please implement NAT64/DNS64 persistent Carrier Grade NAT for those of us that would prefer not to buy a giant A10Networks ThunderCGN. :)

TAYGA is one open source implementation. http://www.litech.org/tayga/
 
guipoletto
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:31 am

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Thu Jan 23, 2020 6:18 am

+1!

Some less hacky CGNAT implementation (Stateless?) would be very welcome! :)
 
muetzekoeln
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 166
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2018 2:34 pm

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Mon May 04, 2020 6:33 pm

+1

see also:
viewtopic.php?t=110925
viewtopic.php?t=42614
viewtopic.php?t=94291

Internet-Uplinks going IPv6 only. Small IoT devices stick to IPv4.
 
platini
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:19 pm

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Mon Apr 05, 2021 9:39 pm

+1 for NAT64. I can live with DNS64 on the powerdns recursor
 
ivantirado
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 4:58 am

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Mon Apr 05, 2021 11:21 pm

+1

see also:
viewtopic.php?t=110925
viewtopic.php?t=42614
viewtopic.php?t=94291

Internet-Uplinks going IPv6 only. Small IoT devices stick to IPv4.
Have you looked at using the web-proxy for this? I haven't tried it but it seems like it can listen on both V6 and V4.
 
lake6kn
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:25 pm
Location: Lake Constance, central Europe

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:43 pm

+1 for NAT64. I can live with DNS64 on the powerdns recursor
+1, NAT64 on MikroTik and DNS64 can be done by powerdns or bind

Maybe JooL (GPLv2) can be an interesting option instead of TAYGA to implement NAT64 or SIIT.
 
sep
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Tue Aug 31, 2021 8:35 pm

jool would be an awesome addition to mikrotik. it would provide essential and critical functionality that is expected of any decent isp router noways.

NAT64
SIIT
MAP-T
NPTv6

It would also provide the important 464XLAT/PLAT CPE functions, that ISP's are searching for now. CPE support is basically what is stopping most isp's from going ipv6 only on the last mile.

mikrotik + jool with proper TR069 support, and mikrotik could be the most interesting cpe in the space. instead people flash arm mikrotiks with openwrt to get access to features.
 
buraglio
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:59 pm
Location: +1 (217)
Contact:

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:00 pm

+1 for NAT64, NPTv6, SIIT. Very, very useful tools for v6 transitioning and new emerging markets. Having to run a NAT64 off to the side is a painful and operationally expensive measure (not to mention the capital cost associated with the commercial options)
ForwardingPlane, LLC
https://www.forwardingplane.net
 
DarkNate
Member
Member
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 4:37 pm

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:21 pm

 
User avatar
SirPrikol
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:36 pm

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Tue Oct 12, 2021 7:34 pm

+1

In addition to TAYGA, another software for nat64 was found on the Internet

https://www.jool.mx/en/index.html
 
mducharme
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1476
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:45 pm

Re: Feature Request - NAT64/DNS64 CGN

Wed Oct 13, 2021 4:02 am

Couldn't you run Jool in Docker now?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], rua and 10 guests