nope ... tried that !
MTik-EoIP and GRETAP make use of different protocol-types
... so ... the feature-request ... is simply a request for a compatibility-flag
. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2784
.
Ok... it should then be possible to make a selection option in the EoIP interface menu and make it compatible.
A bit of a pity that MikroTik defined their own protocol type for this, while a "standard" type already existed for a long time (it appears).
Of course they now cannot simply change it. But an option should be possible.
.
Open vSwitch is using GRETAP as a tunneling option ! ... maybe also an option to terminate MTik-wireless-devices over a distributed-foreign network-infrastructure ?!
... with the new hiperf-switches and 10/25G-routers ... ?! that would be "a feature" also for datacenter-like installations !! ... or a door-opener for large scale wireless-rollouts
~~
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
A bit of a pity that MikroTik defined their own protocol type
.
... sometimes it's just about having my own "Jodeldiplom" ?!
.
... but opening a platform for a compatibilty is - of course - always a sometimes hard-to-know business-decision ...
I see more options, than contraints for this case
~~
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
I think it is mostly caused by not knowing the invented protocol already exists and is registered under another protocol number.
I know a similar case in IPIP tunnel which uses IP protocol 4, but another protocol which is exactly the same was registered much later under protocol number 94.
(and fell into disuse after this was uncovered)