Feature Request: GREtap
Please add GREtap as it is widely accepted everywhere!
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
~~
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
RouterOS has EoIP for that. It is the same thing.
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
nope ... tried that !
MTik-EoIP and GRETAP make use of different protocol-types
... so ... the feature-request ... is simply a request for a compatibility-flag
.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2784
.
.
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019 ... nnels/#gre
.
... no wireguard ... in the article ! ... but hopefully well-discussed in this forum soon : )
MTik-EoIP and GRETAP make use of different protocol-types
... so ... the feature-request ... is simply a request for a compatibility-flag
.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2784
.
Code: Select all
7.2. Protocol Types
GRE uses an ETHER Type for the Protocol Type. New ETHER TYPES are
assigned by Xerox Systems Institute [RFC1700].
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019 ... nnels/#gre
.
... no wireguard ... in the article ! ... but hopefully well-discussed in this forum soon : )
~~
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
.
just to illustrate the issue ( ... opened the archives)
.
just to illustrate the issue ( ... opened the archives)
.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
~~
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
Ok... it should then be possible to make a selection option in the EoIP interface menu and make it compatible.
A bit of a pity that MikroTik defined their own protocol type for this, while a "standard" type already existed for a long time (it appears).
Of course they now cannot simply change it. But an option should be possible.
A bit of a pity that MikroTik defined their own protocol type for this, while a "standard" type already existed for a long time (it appears).
Of course they now cannot simply change it. But an option should be possible.
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
.
Open vSwitch is using GRETAP as a tunneling option ! ... maybe also an option to terminate MTik-wireless-devices over a distributed-foreign network-infrastructure ?!
... with the new hiperf-switches and 10/25G-routers ... ?! that would be "a feature" also for datacenter-like installations !! ... or a door-opener for large scale wireless-rollouts
Open vSwitch is using GRETAP as a tunneling option ! ... maybe also an option to terminate MTik-wireless-devices over a distributed-foreign network-infrastructure ?!
... with the new hiperf-switches and 10/25G-routers ... ?! that would be "a feature" also for datacenter-like installations !! ... or a door-opener for large scale wireless-rollouts
~~
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
.
... sometimes it's just about having my own "Jodeldiplom" ?!
.
... but opening a platform for a compatibilty is - of course - always a sometimes hard-to-know business-decision ...
I see more options, than contraints for this case
.A bit of a pity that MikroTik defined their own protocol type
... sometimes it's just about having my own "Jodeldiplom" ?!
.
... but opening a platform for a compatibilty is - of course - always a sometimes hard-to-know business-decision ...
I see more options, than contraints for this case
~~
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
I think it is mostly caused by not knowing the invented protocol already exists and is registered under another protocol number.
I know a similar case in IPIP tunnel which uses IP protocol 4, but another protocol which is exactly the same was registered much later under protocol number 94.
(and fell into disuse after this was uncovered)
I know a similar case in IPIP tunnel which uses IP protocol 4, but another protocol which is exactly the same was registered much later under protocol number 94.
(and fell into disuse after this was uncovered)
Re: Feature Request: GREtap
Anyone from mikrotik please have a look!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests