I realized my laptop has only link-local ipv6 address. Then I tried:
Code: Select all
[admin@MikroTik] > ipv6 address print
bad command name address (line 1 column 6)
I've got MikroTik hAP lite (RB941-2nD), RouterOS v6.49.6 (stable), Arch Linux.
[admin@MikroTik] > ipv6 address print
bad command name address (line 1 column 6)
Is there a way to figure it out myself? I'm not sure if it makes sense to ask the ISP.1) Your ISP support IPv6?
Good point. It wasn't, but now I think it is. I haven't received an IPv6 address so far though.2) The IPv6 package is installed (or included on bundle package)?
3) The IPv6 package is enabled?
How do I do that?a) The router must be configured to receive, on some way, IPv6 address to redistribute it internally.
I guess I need to at least set IP6 to something in my netctl profile. And maybe DHCP6Client.b) On your os just do not touch nothing, if all is configured correctly on RouterOS, the PC receive it's own IPv6 by SLAAC.
Security by obscurity is not the way to go. Proper firewall is necessary for both ipv4 and ipv6 to protect the LAN devices.IPv4 has NAT and devices are not accessible from anywhere on the internet
Well, no need for a hairpin NAT in IPv6Why.
If that's detailed enough for you, maybe you can make it detailed enough for me? How do I make the router receive IPv6 address to redistribute it internally? Or no further steps are required? It just receives and redistributes it after installing and enabling the ipv6 package?Detailed and easy to understand steps to solve this problem. Thank you for sharing your answer
How do I make the router receive IPv6 address to redistribute it internally?Detailed and easy to understand steps to solve this problem. Thank you for sharing your answer
Could you elaborate? I don't see much difference in configuration capabilities as a home-user.But V7 has much better Ipv6 support than V6.
!) ipv6 - fixed DNS server processing by IPv6/ND services (CVE-2023-32154);
*) ipv6 - added "valid" and "lifetime" parameters for SLAAC IPv6 addresses;
*) ipv6 - send out RA packet with "preferred-lifetime" set to "0" when IPv6 address is deactivated;
*) ipv6 - added "pref64" option configuration for RA;
*) ipv6 - improved handling of "advertise" IPv6 address status changes;
*) ipv6 - limited "hop-limit" parameter value range to 255;
*) ipv6 - made distributed DNS lifetime RFC8106 compliant;
*) ipv6 - do not generate LL addresses for VPN interfaces when IPv6 is disabled;
*) ipv6 - do not use invalid/disabled global addresses for IPv6 ND;
*) ipv6 - fixed system stability when adding/removing IPv6 address;
*) ipv6 - added "ra-preference" parameter support for RA;
*) ipv6 - fixed dynamic non link-local addresses displaying;
*) ipv6 - removed bogus commands from IPv6 neighbors menu;
*) ipv6 - do not add duplicate dynamic prefix when static already exists;
*) ipv6 - fixed "retransmissit-interval" unit value;
*) ipv6 - fixed VLAN tagged PPPoE packet receiving on RB5009;
!) support for IPv6 NAT;
!) completely new IPv6 stack;
!) support for IPv6 ECMP and VRF (including VRF-lite);
!) support for IPv6 recursive routing and policy routing;
# may/26/2023 12:40:40 by RouterOS 7.9.1
# model = RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD
/ipv6 dhcp-client
add add-default-route=yes interface=ether1 pool-name=provider-ipv6 prefix-hint=::/56 request=prefix use-peer-dns=no
/ipv6 address
add address=::764d:xxff:fe4a:xxxx eui-64=yes from-pool=provider-ipv6 interface=home
/ipv6 nd
set [ find default=yes ] disabled=yes
add hop-limit=64 interface=home other-configuration=yes ra-interval=3s-1m
/ipv6 settings
set max-neighbor-entries=8192
It (partly) depends on your ISP. There are different ways of handling IPv6 and some ISPs do not understand it and give you only 1 subnet, meaning you cannot redistribute it internally.If that's detailed enough for you, maybe you can make it detailed enough for me? How do I make the router receive IPv6 address to redistribute it internally? Or no further steps are required? It just receives and redistributes it after installing and enabling the ipv6 package?Detailed and easy to understand steps to solve this problem. Thank you for sharing your answer
This is no problem if every company and engineer learnt route aggregation:If each company had its own public pool, independent of the ISP/AS, the route table, which currently has ~1,000,000 just for IPv4,
would become so gigantic that it would be unmanageable...
I collide with everyday reality, which unfortunately is not the ideal case...This is no problem if every company and engineer learnt route aggregation:
I'm still waiting for MAP-T support on MikroTik, end-to-end. If they don't support it soon, me and many other operators out there will simply move to other vendors that support MAP-T.But the crowd demands 464XLAT too!
viewtopic.php?t=155791?
I've said it before. Mental illness that plagues reality is not my day-care job. I can only point everyone to facts, info and standards. Whether they have the mental health to implement route aggregation or not, is outside my domain.I collide with everyday reality, which unfortunately is not the ideal case...