Ah, so that's the meaning of initial letter in names of "xAP" devices ... so "cAP" means "ceiling AP". @Normins, do you mind explaining meaning of "h" in "hAP"? And are there any "pAP" (pole AP) devices?As in the name, it's a "wall acces point (wap)",
... which doesn't really belong into xAP family of devices, does it? And generally doesn't provide wireless coverage at all, does it? In case you missed: this thread was about wAP and @Normis tried to explain that wAP (due to being wall AP) doesn't really have spherical radiation pattern. And then I extended question to meaning of acronyms of other AP devices.Dont forget:
CRS: Cloud router switch
...
I would suggest a NetMetal ax with 2x HGO-antenna-OUT... which doesn't really belong into xAP family of devices, does it? And generally doesn't provide wireless coverage at all, does it? In case you missed: this thread was about wAP and @Normis tried to explain that wAP (due to being wall AP) doesn't really have spherical radiation pattern. And then I extended question to meaning of acronyms of other AP devices.Dont forget:
CRS: Cloud router switch
...
Well, we do have a drawing:In case you missed: this thread was about wAP and @Normis tried to explain that wAP (due to being wall AP) doesn't really have spherical radiation pattern.
Well, then you did not understand my intention. It is about this: Normis based his answer (quote: "As in the name, it's a "wall acces point (wap)", so it is designed to be used against a surface.") on the product naming.... which doesn't really belong into xAP family of devices, does it? And generally doesn't provide wireless coverage at all, does it? In case you missed: this thread was about wAP and @Normis tried to explain that wAP (due to being wall AP) doesn't really have spherical radiation pattern. And then I extended question to meaning of acronyms of other AP devices.Dont forget:
CRS: Cloud router switch
...
This is great to know -- thank you.hAP - home AP
wAP - wall AP
cAP - ceiling AP
wsAP - wall socket AP
mAP - mini AP
ltAP - LTE AP
I think we can safely describe the pattern as "highly directional" and not "360 degrees." It appears that, when in oriented in the vertical position, it has a usable maximum beamwidth of ~120 degrees (but probably more like 90*).I think we can define the pattern as "ball with flat bottom"::
https://www.brunnershop.com/en/One-Shot ... ottom.html
I would suggest a NetMetal ax with 2x HGO-antenna-OUT
Maybe stupid question, but aren't the two HGO-antenna-OUT directly mounted too near to each other to do any good?
The mentioned antennas are not "tiltable", so they can't be arranged at 90° angle. Which means that yes, layout on the picture is almost useless (my estimate is that it works approximately at 1.1x1.1MIMO). But I'm sure one can get similar, but tiltable, antennas on-line ... and when arranged at +-45° tilt, they allow for proper 2x2MIMO operation.If necessary, you can adapt the NetMetal ax for lower range use with such antennas as our HGO-antenna-OUT screw-on omni antenna unit.
Does it come with antennas?
Principle use of NetMetal ax is to attach good antennas to the RP-SMA connectors. The image with antennas attached shows secondary use, from product brochure:
The mentioned antennas are not "tiltable", so they can't be arranged at 90° angle. Which means that yes, layout on the picture is almost useless (my estimate is that it works approximately at 1.1x1.1MIMO). But I'm sure one can get similar, but tiltable, antennas on-line ... and when arranged at +-45° tilt, they allow for proper 2x2MIMO operation.
Got it -- thank you.No, the device comes without antennas.
First -- there is no such thing as a "type Y" connector (joking!)First ---> Decide if you want OMNI antennal (360deg), sector antenna 90/110/120/140 degrees, point to point antenna ( narrow sector)
Second --> Figure out what type of connectors does the device have...............
Third --> Google BEST wifi/wisp antennas 2024, with connectors of type Y, with sector width a degress to b degrees.
Sure, anything East of the Atlantic ocean gets the good stuff, eh?The posted picture comes from:
https://www.mikrotik-store.eu/
https://www.mikrotik-store.eu/de/mikrot ... etmetal-ax
The mANT-LTE-5o is designed for LTE frequencies, less than 5dbi gain, and SMA connectors (not RP-SMA).Yup, not a wifi techie, so sure you have to ensure compatibility of antenna with available connectors.
Who woulda thunk it.......... an antenna with two connectors.................... I must be clairvoyant..........
https://mikrotik.com/product/mant_lte_5o
The only advantage of europe is that they have more range on their 2ghz stuff, the rest of the freq spectrum, man are they screwed - if a frequency vibrates anal lips, it will be banned in Europe, in the US, that a free massage ( dont ask me what they are just made it up......could be ear lobes )
However the food and beer is better and cheaper (unless you live in Denmark) and the alcohol, cannot find bad wine etc..........
Interesting but not particularly compelling.They are not common, but they exist.
Example:
https://www.quwireless.com/product/qusector-7v-120-2
120 degrees, dual connector, mimo 2x2.
That is a great explanation.There are such antennas, but they don't come cheap, are large and (some of them) look ugly.
Antenna gain is generally proportional to antenna size and antenna size for given gain is generally proportional to wavelength. Which in essence means that at certain gain antenna for 2.4GHz has to be 2-times larger (in both directions, perpendicular to main lobe direction) than antenna with similar gain but for 5GHz. And that, at the same time, means that most wide-band antennas have higher gain (and narrower beam) for higher frequency end and proportionally lower gain (and wider beam) for lower frequency end of supported frequency band. This is specially true for "dish-like" antennas, some other (extremely ugly looking) antennas fare a bit better (e.g. yagi or log-periodic antennas) but those tend to be physically bigger (and have lower WAF).
What I don't understand is how the dual RP-SMA ports work? How does the AP (transceiver) look at those ports?
Another great explanation.What I don't understand is how the dual RP-SMA ports work? How does the AP (transceiver) look at those ports?
Most probably those dual antenna ports are used for MIMO ... and for each MIMO leg (in WiFi they are called chains) one needs a separate antenna. Some antennas are dual-port (or MIMO) and actually include two antennas in the same housing. For 2x2 MIMO the easiest way to make best use of it is to use two antennas and tilt them at 90° angle ... all antennas are polarized and using them at 90° angle this means two independent polarization planes. Another possibility to make MIMO work is to spatially separate antennas (by a few wavelengths at minimum). When using higer-rank of MIMO (e.g. 4x4), one has to use combination of both approaches (polarization only offers two planes).
Another possibility is that those antenna ports are there for different frequency bands (which then means 1x1 MIMO for each).
They exist, but I think there isn't enough demand for them to keep making them (people want more gain, not to be hampered by dual-band designs).I would love a dual band, 120 to 180 degree azimuth, 10-15dbi gain, dual RP-SMA antenna. That would be fun to play with.
Yep, but I think OP is already beyond the WAP, a Netmetal Ax (+antenna(s)) is going to cost much more.maybe an option like mANTBox ax 15s can be considered, i know is not so cheap as the wAP but can be very useful
https://mikrotik.com/product/mantbox_ax_15s
You can put amalgamating tape around the connectors, this will help with waterYep, but I think OP is already beyond the WAP, a Netmetal Ax (+antenna(s)) is going to cost much more.maybe an option like mANTBox ax 15s can be considered, i know is not so cheap as the wAP but can be very useful
https://mikrotik.com/product/mantbox_ax_15s
What is not clear (to me) is how wide the area to be covered is, the Mantbox ax 15 s is still pretty much directional, 120° or so, so maybe two will be needed to cover a wider area.
Having to choose personally I would prefer a "all in one" device such as the Mantbox as in the long period the cable connections from AP to antenna are more likely to oxidize/loose insulation/whatever.
The Mantbox looks very interesting.Yep, but I think OP is already beyond the WAP, a Netmetal Ax (+antenna(s)) is going to cost much more.maybe an option like mANTBox ax 15s can be considered, i know is not so cheap as the wAP but can be very useful
https://mikrotik.com/product/mantbox_ax_15s
What is not clear (to me) is how wide the area to be covered is, the Mantbox ax 15 s is still pretty much directional, 120° or so, so maybe two will be needed to cover a wider area.
Having to choose personally I would prefer a "all in one" device such as the Mantbox as in the long period the cable connections from AP to antenna are more likely to oxidize/loose insulation/whatever.
https://youtu.be/n1Zfq_SDTrY?t=90&si=HsXnvttvyH9-dRIxhAP - home AP
wAP - wall AP
cAP - ceiling AP
wsAP - wall socket AP
mAP - mini AP
ltAP - LTE AP
Great video -- I didn't know they make regular video newsletters.https://youtu.be/n1Zfq_SDTrY?t=90&si=HsXnvttvyH9-dRIxhAP - home AP
wAP - wall AP
cAP - ceiling AP
wsAP - wall socket AP
mAP - mini AP
ltAP - LTE AP
Viktors says wAP stands for "wireless access point".
I think that that is only to distinguish it from wired access pointsViktors says wAP stands for "wireless access point".
I don't know about you, but I have my Audience wired ... both for PoE and for backhaul. And it only works as AP (no routing or anything else). Which it means Audience is a wired API think that that is only to distinguish it from wired access pointsViktors says wAP stands for "wireless access point".
i have a mantbox, am currently using it as a test indoors, but the signal strenght is'nt good at all what could be the issue.maybe an option like mANTBox ax 15s can be considered, i know is not so cheap as the wAP but can be very useful
https://mikrotik.com/product/mantbox_ax_15s