Simple CAPSMAN setup not working (Multiple SSIDs, multiple Networks)
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2025 1:35 am
Hello,
I wanted to upgrade my home network with some good Mikrotik hardware - but unfortunately I do miserably fail.
My setup
I do use a hAP ax^3 as "main router" which connects to my ISPs Router (DSL, nothing fancy)
One floor below I have a hAP ax^2 for connecting my streaming devices
At the basement I do have a hAP ax lite for streaming and iot devices
The devices are interconnected with some powerline adapters which work also good (so they are connected by ethernet cable to the main router)
My WIFI setup (assumption)
4 WIFIs
- Computer
- Streaming
- IoT
- Security
All WIFIs should be separated by IP-Scopes, the devices should be handed over "seamlessly" (from one station to another), updating the passwords or WIFI settings should not be a hassle.
So I thought CAPSMAN (v2) should be a good choice (which I also did/used "ages ago" (CAPSMAN v1).
How did I thought I can achieve this:
- Channels (24 and 50)
- Security (for every WIFI)
- Datapath with corresponding bridge at the main router as choosen option (for every WIFI)
- Configuration with the corresponding SSID (for every WIFI)
- Provisioning (for every WIFI / Band)
Configure the remote CAP and configuring the hap ax^2 and ax lite to get configured by the hap ax^3
And normally we're done...
My problem:
The ethernet port where the powerline adapter is connected to the hap ax^3 is in a bridge, where all other routers should get an IP (lets call it BackBone).
According to what I understood about CAPSMAN all traffic should go to the hap ax^3 and then to the according bridge.
But currently all traffic/clients exits at the BackBone Bridge... (so in every wifi you get the same ip-scope)
If I look at eg. the hap ax^2 - there is a new datapath.
The name of the datapath is "capdp" and it exits the (only existing) bridge at the hap ax^2.
So the setting is completely ignored. I did not configure anything special (like Slaves Datapath, Slaves Static) in the settings of the Slaves.
Can someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong or if this is simply not possible (and I wasted a lot of time and money).
Thanks for any idea/support
Bjoern
I wanted to upgrade my home network with some good Mikrotik hardware - but unfortunately I do miserably fail.
My setup
I do use a hAP ax^3 as "main router" which connects to my ISPs Router (DSL, nothing fancy)
One floor below I have a hAP ax^2 for connecting my streaming devices
At the basement I do have a hAP ax lite for streaming and iot devices
The devices are interconnected with some powerline adapters which work also good (so they are connected by ethernet cable to the main router)
My WIFI setup (assumption)
4 WIFIs
- Computer
- Streaming
- IoT
- Security
All WIFIs should be separated by IP-Scopes, the devices should be handed over "seamlessly" (from one station to another), updating the passwords or WIFI settings should not be a hassle.
So I thought CAPSMAN (v2) should be a good choice (which I also did/used "ages ago" (CAPSMAN v1).
How did I thought I can achieve this:
- Channels (24 and 50)
- Security (for every WIFI)
- Datapath with corresponding bridge at the main router as choosen option (for every WIFI)
- Configuration with the corresponding SSID (for every WIFI)
- Provisioning (for every WIFI / Band)
Configure the remote CAP and configuring the hap ax^2 and ax lite to get configured by the hap ax^3
And normally we're done...
My problem:
The ethernet port where the powerline adapter is connected to the hap ax^3 is in a bridge, where all other routers should get an IP (lets call it BackBone).
According to what I understood about CAPSMAN all traffic should go to the hap ax^3 and then to the according bridge.
But currently all traffic/clients exits at the BackBone Bridge... (so in every wifi you get the same ip-scope)
If I look at eg. the hap ax^2 - there is a new datapath.
The name of the datapath is "capdp" and it exits the (only existing) bridge at the hap ax^2.
So the setting is completely ignored. I did not configure anything special (like Slaves Datapath, Slaves Static) in the settings of the Slaves.
Can someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong or if this is simply not possible (and I wasted a lot of time and money).
Thanks for any idea/support
Bjoern