Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020
 
wsgtrsys
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 2:22 pm

Feature request: add Application Layer Packet Classifier

Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:29 am

http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
it's Application Layer Packet Classifier ,it's great!

can't be add to routeros?
 
changeip
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3804
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 5:22 pm

Sun Sep 04, 2005 6:45 pm

If your looking to match p2p packets MT already has done this for quite some time. What other uses do you see for it?

Sam
 
dwa
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 12:18 pm

Mon Sep 05, 2005 9:49 pm

What other uses do you see for it?
QoS for http, ftp ...
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6621
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Mon Sep 05, 2005 9:53 pm

You can easily configure QoS for http and FTP using RouterOS.
 
dwa
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 12:18 pm

Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:13 am

You can easily configure QoS for http and FTP using RouterOS
???
 
kjagus
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 11:29 pm
Location: Poland

Tue Sep 06, 2005 6:35 pm

 
dwa
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 12:18 pm

Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:15 pm

There is no answer to my question.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24424
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:13 am

what do you mean, the whole page talks about QoS ... if you were looking for something else, please define what You mean by QoS
 
dwa
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 12:18 pm

Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:28 pm

what do you mean, the whole page talks about QoS ... if you were looking for something else, please define what You mean by QoS
1. Classify packets as HTTP, FTP, etc., regardless of port
2. Mangle
3. Queues

Question is for 1.
 
cmit
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1552
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Germany

Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:14 pm

I know what you mean - you want more classifiers by content, like the P2P classifiers in MikroTik.
But the question is how important is it to be able to classify HTTP traffic running on non-standard ports?
This mostly will be special web applications which could be better classified by other means?!
Best regards,
Christian Meis
 
dwa
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 12:18 pm

Wed Sep 07, 2005 3:38 pm

I know what you mean - you want more classifiers by content, like the P2P classifiers in MikroTik.
Yes
But the question is how important is it to be able to classify HTTP traffic running on non-standard ports?
Not only HTTP.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24424
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:20 pm

you can do something if you know the packet content. you can use packet content in mangle
 
wsgtrsys
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 2:22 pm

Tue Sep 13, 2005 5:56 am

l7-filter is more flexible and multifunctional than ipp2p
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24424
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:23 pm

we are thinking about adding an l7 filter
 
User avatar
JJCinAZ
Member
Member
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

Mon Oct 03, 2005 8:04 pm

I second that motion to add the L7 packet classifier code. This functionality would seriously enhance the Mikrotik platform for businesses and ISP's.
 
pedja
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 5:37 am

Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:15 pm

I also vote for content filtering. That missing feauture had strong infulence on my clients decision to use something else and not MT in several occasions.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chupaka, jdejansb, Sob and 74 guests