SwOS Web Interface Error

log · February 3, 2011, 6:45pm

http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/swos-web-interface-error/40705/1
sergejs wrote:
Thank you very much for your reports and feedbacks!
We have fixed the problem, the fix will be available in the next SwOS version

Sadly at fw 1.4 problem still occurs.

INTERNAL ERROR:SyntaxError: missing ] after element list

log · August 1, 2011, 7:08am

How long we will have to wait?
I have enough, I cant use these switches because of it.

djsuszi · August 1, 2011, 12:21pm

“Not yet, but this problem is on to-do list and will be fixed in version 1.6.”
you can try parse hosts data
http://192.168.88.1/!dhost.b
with some script.

log · August 25, 2011, 11:19am

Firmware 1.6 doesnt fix error.

zervan · August 26, 2011, 5:49pm

As I’ve written in other thread - version 1.6 has fixed the problem for me. With previous versions I was mad because of the problem you describe. I don’t say you lie - I believe you may have the problem, but the question is - what’s different? Let’s try to figure out, why you do have the problem and I do not.

What is your uptime when problem appears? I have 10 days without problem.
How many hosts do you have in network? I have 430 in the host table now.
Do you use VLAN, SNMP or ACL? Me not.
Do you use static hosts? I use them, only few.
Do you use Broadcast Storm Control? I use 1k f/s.
Do you use Mikrotik Discovery Protocol? I do.
How fast connection to web interface do you have? I am connected locally at 1 Gbps, but I’ve tested remote connection over slow DSL line and it is working as well (it lasts cca 4 seconds to load the table).
What web browser do you use? I’ve tested Opera, Firefox, Internet Explorer (all of them in the newest version).

log · August 26, 2011, 6:34pm

OK.

I think its about 3 days.

About 400.

ACL - rules to block tcp/udp 135-139, 445 and rogue dhcp.

No.

1Gbs links, some wifi.

FF (5 and now 6), IE7 and opera.
At opera error is diffrent: INTERNAL ERROR:SyntaxError: at index 65898: syntax error

zervan · August 26, 2011, 7:07pm

I’ve turned off these two now to see if it will change something.

zervan · September 10, 2011, 4:49pm

It is still working for me, I don’t understand why is it different for you. Maybe it has nothing to do with configuration and there is a problem caused by something special on your network (don’t know what, maybe something is generating a lot of false MAC addresses sometimes or something like that)

siscom · September 11, 2011, 5:30pm

Hi Zervan,

Tried to pm you but not possible on this board. Thought this link might interest you - http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/irish-wisp-requires-experienced-staff/50034/1

Good luck

Rgds,
Mark.

zervan · September 11, 2011, 5:59pm

Thanks! At least I try to ask And you are right - I can not send PM as well, I didn’t know that, so I should leave a contact somehow.

log · September 12, 2011, 8:40am

I have only client macs addresses so I dont know where is the difference.
I sent ticket to mt support, will see.

log · February 21, 2012, 12:32pm

Does anyone else have this problem or its only me?

reverged · February 21, 2012, 3:54pm

It’s not only you!

The problem is improved, but not completely fixed with 1.6

The problem seems to occur if there is a high latency between the browser and the switch.

i.e. I am on the US west coast and I have trouble managing switches on the east coast but west coast switches manage fine.

I have tried all sorts of browser combinations…

log · February 21, 2012, 5:57pm

In my case its not latency - im connected to switch through FO.

vchrizz · July 10, 2016, 8:19am

ive got this problem too with RB260G and v1.16.
but its not latency issues for me, i guess its some (bridge-?)loop or similar.
ping is fine. i do use vlans.

looking at http://192.168.88.1/!dhost.b
it shows about 100 lines of the following:
[{adr:‘44d9e7ff7191’,prt:0x02,drp:0x00,mir:0x00,sts:0x07,vid:0x01dc},{adr:‘44d9e7ff7191’,prt:0x02,drp:0x00,mir:0x00,sts:0x07,vid:0x01dc},{adr:‘44d9e7ff7191’,prt:0x02,drp:0x00,mir:0x00,sts:0x07,vid:0x01dc},{adr:‘44d9e7ff7191’,prt:0x02,drp:0x00,mir:0x00,sts:0x07,vid:0x01dc},{adr:‘44d9e7ff7191’,prt:0x02,drp:0x00,mir:0x00,sts:0x07,vid:0x01dc},{adr:‘44d9e7ff7191’,prt:0x02,drp:0x00,mir:0x00,sts:0x07,vid:0x01dc},

adr is my routers vlan-trunkport which is correct, vid should be vlan id in hex i guess? just that “1dc” would be vlan 476 (in decimal) but i dont know anything about vlan476 ?

k6ccc · July 11, 2016, 4:29pm

Working fine for me on a RB260GS with version 1.16
I have about 50 entries in the hosts table and using multiple VLANs. As I type this, up time is a little under 36 days. I am looking at it with FireFox version 46.0.1 from an old XP desktop computer. The connection from the desktop to the switch is 100Base-T from PC to an HP 2610-48 switch, and then 1000Base-T (with multiple VLANs) from the HP to the RB260GS SFP port.

Jim

k6ccc · July 11, 2016, 4:37pm

Followup to what I wrote a couple minutes ago. When I click the Hosts tab on the switch, I am taken to 192.168.204.4/index.html#dhost I tried the !dhost.b address (with my IP of course) that vchrizz used, and I get a similar result that he got. So I guess I would ask where did the !dhost.b address come from? And what address do you get taken to when clicking the hosts tab on the switch web interface?
Jim

andriys · July 11, 2016, 4:40pm

Sounds like a browser cache issue. Try testing with a clean browser profile.