dear all,
i’m using ros v3.7 and tried the new cache hit dscp (tos) and it works. somehow i notice not all sites are cached, for example, apple.com is not being cached by mikrotik proxy no more.
are you guys having same problem with me?
dear all,
i’m using ros v3.7 and tried the new cache hit dscp (tos) and it works. somehow i notice not all sites are cached, for example, apple.com is not being cached by mikrotik proxy no more.
are you guys having same problem with me?
Did I type that out ???
pardon me, i don’t get what your point is.
i also notice the bandwidth management is not working so well when using this new proxy from mikrotik. fyi, i’m using mikrotik routeros v3.7.
will serialize-connections make bandwidth management out of control when someone is using the whole bandwidth through such as download manager or so?
what is pro and cons for using always-from-cache?
will this pentium 3 1ghz cpu, 384mb sdram ram, 4gb system hdd and 80gb cache hdd, work just fine to manage around 65 computers using pcq for equal bandwidth sharing among users and mikrotik proxy?
or should i change the box with pentium dual-core e2140, 2gb ddr2 ram, the same hdd as the above? will i get better system responsive for bandwidth management with the new future box?
thanks in advance.
here’s my configuration:
5 chain=dstnat action=redirect to-ports=3128 src-address=192.168.0.0/24 in-interface=local dst-port=80 protocol=tcp
15 ;;; proxy indosat
chain=output action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=proxy
passthrough=no dst-address-list=indosat out-interface=local dscp=416 ;;; indosat
chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=indosat
passthrough=yes src-address-list=indosat17 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=indosat-upload
passthrough=no dst-address=!192.168.0.0/24 routing-mark=indosat
in-interface=local18 chain=forward action=mark-connection
new-connection-mark=indosat-connection passthrough=yes
routing-mark=indosat19 chain=forward action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=indosat-download
passthrough=no in-interface=indosat
connection-mark=indosat-connection20 chain=output action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=indosat-download
passthrough=no dst-address-list=indosat out-interface=local
src-port=!8291 protocol=tcp
4 name=“indosat-upload” parent=indosat-up packet-mark=indosat-upload limit-at=0 queue=pcq-upload priority=8
max-limit=496000 burst-limit=0 burst-threshold=0 burst-time=0s5 name=“indosat-download” parent=indosat-down packet-mark=indosat-download limit-at=0 queue=pcq-download priority=8
max-limit=496000 burst-limit=0 burst-threshold=0 burst-time=0s6 name=“indosat-down” parent=local packet-mark=“” limit-at=0 queue=default priority=8 max-limit=512000 burst-limit=0
burst-threshold=0 burst-time=0s7 name=“indosat-up” parent=global-in packet-mark=“” limit-at=0 queue=default priority=8 max-limit=512000 burst-limit=0
burst-threshold=0 burst-time=0s
enabled: yes
src-address: 0.0.0.0
port: 3128
parent-proxy: 0.0.0.0
parent-proxy-port: 0
cache-drive: secondary-master
cache-administrator: “webmaster”
max-cache-size: unlimited
cache-on-disk: yes
max-client-connections: 600
max-server-connections: 600
max-fresh-time: 3d
serialize-connections: no
always-from-cache: no
cache-hit-dscp: 4
downgrade to v2.9.51 and voila! apple.com is cached again. i notice v2.9.x web-proxy is better than v3.7. the only cons in v2.9 is how to by pass hit cache so we get full LAN speed.
does anybody here know how to by pass ROS 2.9.51 internal web-proxy HIT cache?
Didnt mean to make lite of you problem…
Just interesting that it piked Apple.com…
oh i see, i just pick random site to see whether it’s cached or not. hehe