CRS125-24G-1S-2HnD-IN Throughput Slow????

Hardware MikroTik hardware general
1

Does anyone know what the throughput of the CRS125-24G-1S-2HnD-IN should be.

I copied a 900 MB ISO file from a Windows 7 Pro box from a QNAP TS469PRO NAS.
RESULTS:


HP Procurve 1810-24Gv2
Semi Managed Layer 2 Switch
Speed: 110 MBps approx. throughput
LACP Bonding - Same speed (Higher possible but not with windows 7 client)


Mikrotik CRS125-24G-1S-2HnD-IN
Fully Manageable Layer 3???
Speed: 50 MBps

LACP Bonding using Ports 23 and 24 LACP bridged to Ether 2 Bridge that came with settings
Speed: 1MBps - 5 MBps MAX Mbps :open_mouth: :open_mouth: :confused:

Am I doing something wrong or does something need to be tweaked / setup on the CRS125-24G-1S-2HnD-IN?
The wire speed is almost half of the procurve??? and the LACP Bonding is almost 50 times slower???

I must be doing something wrong right?

The switch is out of the box nothing changed except trying to setup bonding and then bridging it to the already stock bridge.

Any help would be appreciated.

2

Ok if anyone is having speed issues I found the fix
Once you have at least RoS 6.9 Installed
Reset your configuration via the menu
After a reboot I got 100+ MBps or 900+ Mbps
Factory Reset even though it was out of the box fixed the problem

3

Hello,
same problem here with both CRS125-24G-1S-RM and CRS125-24G-1S-2HnD-IN upgraded to ROS6.10.

Tried all kind of LACP configurations: the problem is that when you put the bonded interface in the bridge, the CPU go at 70/80%.

Very bad. I hope Mikrotik will fix this ASAP or give us better informations on how operate these switches.

4

I think LACP isn’t fully implemented on those. It’s like VLANs and the switch chip… its not implemented. Hopefully soon…

5

I think LACP isn’t fully implemented on those.

You are right but in normal cases terms and conditions it would speed up
mostly as I was finding out, only the following case:

“If many users or devices are calling or trying to connect one Server or
one other device”

So it is in my eyes not so very easy to test those setups to get
a dedicated test result that is mirroring back the true situation.

@tcpip77
Switching (Layer2) is even faster transporting the packets
then a routing (Layer3)

I have had more preferred that MikroTik is coding the SwitchOS new
and/or adding many Switch oriented functions or options, but ok let us see
what the future is bringing in.