Hello,
I’m currently testing RSTP between two 6.44.3 instances.
I’m not familiar at all with STP and the likes.
I looked at first example (the one involving switches SW1, SW2, SW3 and SW4 and hosts A and B) in RSTP Wiki page (see [1]).
-
I can read that SW1 settings rely on priority while SW4 rely on path-cost.
Can you explain why ?
-
Are those priority and path-cost exclusively used by RSTP (and relatives) or shall I expect other side effects.
[1] https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Spanning_Tree_Protocol
tdw
2
I looked at first example (the one involving switches SW1, SW2, SW3 and SW4 and hosts A and B) in RSTP Wiki page (see [1]).
- I can read that SW1 settings rely on priority while SW4 rely on path-cost.
Can you explain why ?
Per the Wiki:
In RouterOS the root bridge will be elected based on the smallest priority and the smallest MAC address in this particular order:
- Bridge priority (lowest)
- Bridge MAC address (lowest)
In RouterOS root ports are elected based on lowest port path cost, lowest port priority and lowest bridge port ID in this particular order:
- Port path cost (lowest)
- Port priority (lowest)
- Bridge port ID (lowest)
Once the root bridge has been determined, the best path is used to determine which ports should be used to reach that root bridge.
- Are those priority and path-cost exclusively used by RSTP (and relatives) or shall I expect other side effects.
These are purely internal to STP/RSTP/MSTP.