In the test RB1100Ahx2 noticed that when updating the queue was not simple and that the correct markings in queue tree no longer an option in global-and global-out, only global.
I would guess that MT isn’t keen on supporting or improving VM performance at all, It introduces the abilty to clone the HDD without triggering a new license key, If they were to offer great support/speed with VM’s they would need to figure a way to lock down the licence key’s better than HDD image backed
That reason crossed my mind too. But on second thought, does it really make sense? Current RouterOS already works with VMware. And if you buy one licence, there’s nothing except your honesty preventing you from making a thousand clones with it. What would change if RouterOS supported virtualization a little better? Well, people would tend to use it more, obviously. Both paying and non-paying ones. Which still sounds like MikroTik’s victory to me.
it would be same problems as with XEN where previously. Either start developing for them, or you end up with a feature that is not usable. And your customers rely on the feature. Not long ago it took several month for vmware to update “virtual hardware” to be compatible with intel released e1000 driver. On the other hand - KVM has its set of drivers that just works and are fully supported by Linux kernel devs.
ubuntu has an open-vm-tools package. Mikrotik can have it too. As more than a 100 licenses purchased and 3 CCR’s running in my network, i request vm-tools.npk
Yes please, vmxnet3 is already in linux kernel, please include (enable) it also in mikrotik. And there are open vmware tools https://github.com/vmware/open-vm-tools