Thank you @CGGXANNX .
The script isn’t run by netwatch; it’s run by the system scheduler. “netwatch” only came up due to referencing the need for the ftp permission for fetch in ROSv7 from the linked thread (which, when I pasted the link in, I had not expected the forum software to replace the link text with the name of the linked thread). I apologize for the confusion.
Here is the system scheduler configuration from /system/scheduler print detail which runs this script:
name="DNSMadeEasy dynamic update2" start-date=2026-02-18 start-time=14:17:26 interval=1m on-event=DNSMadeEasy dynamic update2 owner="admin"
policy=ftp,reboot,read,write,policy,test,password,sniff,sensitive,romon run-count=104 next-run=2026-02-27 10:35:26
Providing an entire configuration export would seem to add an awful lot of extraneous information, and someone (various someones
) decades ago early in my tech career told me to be more succint …
(although that was a bit more in the tech-person-talking-to-business-person context).
Hm, also, even with hide-sensitive there is a lot of information in there that, ideally, wouldn’t be shared, so it’s a lot of work to properly sanitize the output.
Erm. I started manually further sanitizing the 800+ line configuration export, and .. no. I’ve been a security geek for decades, and that’s just Too Much Information.
I realize that RouterOS is monumentally powerful (that’s why we like it), and monumentally complicated (that’s why we love to hate it, while we still like it), and not super well documented (see above), and why a configuration output in certain very complex cases would be necessary, but I just can’t bring myself to post the whole even-hide-sensitive configuration export, nor to spend the huge effort to manually sanitize it.
In cases like this, I hope that the right balance is that, if there is some weird internal conflict possible in a MikroTik configuration that could cause an intermittent failure in a /tool fetch command ( Fetch - RouterOS - MikroTik Documentation it doesn’t seem that the overall configuration should much affect it), that instead of expecting everyone to open their coat wide from the start, more specific pieces of the config would be requested after.
If, as a result, people don’t want to help, so be it.
Again, thanks.