I think a "general-non-Mikrotik" category should be added

[jaclaz]

I just hijacked (apologies to anav) a thread with a question that while definitely non-Mikrotik-related is definitely Mikrotik-originated:

Forum Participants Opportunity For Input to Wireguard

Hi folks, I spent some time trying to understand how BTH works and the functionality being slowly introduced with it, at the same time I was learning to use winbox4. It was clear to me BOTH were unfinished pieces of work with exciting promise. I therefore attemtped to harness the new functionality and improve the config process for US to implement wireguard solutions in the thread linked below. MT staff are very much interested in developing the gui further and are asking for input HERE. …

I.e. I wouldn’t have even thought of playing with Wireguard had it not be an option in RouterOS, but since it is there (and it is working just fine) it creates issues on the normal OS running its client (Windows 7 in this case) and noone is more qualified to share their experiences than actual Mikrotik users.

I presume that the same can happen with various other services/features of RouterOS, that don’t really fit in “RouterOS->General”.

Maybe we could have added a self-standing section (similar to “3rd Party Tools”) loosely like “Other OS interactions” or “General Other OS” where to discuss similar issues and share user experiences.

[teslasystems]

I would call it ‘General networking’