Intel Atom mainboard: Gigabyte d525tud - without wireless cards -
respect ! 
nice
did you tested v4 on the same hardware?
It might be even faster with hyperthreading off…
and now try this test with UDP and packet size 500 )))
Compiled and works 2WAN x86-based router Jetway NF99 (Atom D525 / 2h82574L) equipped with a daughter card AD3INLAN-G (3x82541PI) pictures. Both insertions are used as a WAN, the daughter’s nic’s combined bridge and used as a LAN. Distribution and receipt of about 150 Mbps real torrent traffic, as well as web surfing, etc. Balancing 2WAN (PCC outgoing requests by the addresses, for incoming requests - by connections and addresses).
QoS control is not used.
Originally planned to purchase RB1100AH ​​(x2), but for reasons of silence and versatility, as well as stock performance selection is made on x86.
Best in class is Supermicro Embedded X7SPA-H-D525, because it has good integradet Intel Lan (2x Intel 82574L Gigabit LAN).
This nic supports multiple tx/rx queues and very well offloads work from cpu.
It is very optimal solution, because it has only 25w power consumtion, and beats any routerboard.
Best regards.
Intel DN2800MT with RouterOS 6.0beta2:
UDP 500 byte Send: 780mbit/s
UDP 500 byte Receive: 400mbit/s
This system uses 13 watt.
Impressive!
One of you has KVM package and other not. I am wondering because D525 specs show that it does not have virtualization support.
Do you have a chance to test if configuration supports KVM? We are close to buying a Jetway AMD board with AMD-V for the purpose of KVM but none of it supports the 3xLAN extension board, whereas the Intel motherboards do. Many thanks.
I don’t think KVM is going to work on this board (N2800 or D525). Is Virtualbox or VMware not an option? I don’t know for sure if RouterOS works on these, but I think it should work.
It definitely wont work, no VT support in those CPUs
Vmware and Virtualbox don’t need VT.
VMware and virtual box aren’t an option. VMware has required vt for years and virtualbox is nearly impossible to use without vt