Hello! We have the technology cisco is “Local Proxy Arp”.
How about mikrotik?
Maybe some other way it is implemented?
You are going to have to be much much clearer and more detailed in what you are looking for and what you want to do/accomplish. If you haven’t gotten an answer to your post, chances are it is a very vague question that doesn’t provide any real information on what you have, what you are looking for, and what you want to do.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/getting-the-most-out-of-this-forum/40983/1
Hello, I’m not speak well in English.
I can give a link to the description: https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1267
Proxy-arp is supported and enabled. You just have to turn it on for a given routed interface.
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/Ethernet
Now I cannot answer specifically if it will do what you are wanting since I don’t know how you intend to use it.
You did not understand me. I’m not talking about the “Proxy ARP”. I’m trying to talk about the “Local Proxy Arp”.
Proxy ARP - works only between interfaces.
Local Proxy Arp - router responds to any ARP request to its MAC-address on this interface.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/185522
No there is no way to restrict it to just one subnet.
Looking for the “private vlan proxy arp” feature too, see RFC 3069, supported since Linux 2.6.34, can be enabled by /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/proxy_arp_pvlan . If ROS 5.x is based on 2.6.35, it should be fairly easy for Mikrotik to add this feature.
I have a few wireless APs each with client isolation enabled, connected to a switch with “protected ports” feature which basically does the same between different APs, yet would like to allow some devices in the same IP subnet to communicate through the router despite the L2 isolation. All these APs and stations connected to them have to be in the same subnet, as the stations can move between AP without IP address changes (if one sector fails, customers can be moved to adjacent sectors with weaker signal but better than nothing). Can’t replace the switch (Netgear GS110TP) with a Mikrotik bridge as it has other unique features (802.3af PoE output, external 48V DC power supply, reasonable cost).
mikrotik does not support this future, but you can try enable (you need a little hack to routeros). Some time ago i use this hack with sysctl on v4.x
The easiest way is to use bridge and bridge firewall future (work on any ROS version)
What hack do you mean, how can I access Linux sysctl from within RouterOS 5.x on RB2011L? As I mentioned, can’t really use a bridge instead of the switch I already have (couldn’t find gigabit 802.3af midspan injectors with external 48V DC input at reasonable price, settled for Netgear GS110TP switch instead). Need the router (actually a virtual one, two physical ones with VRRP failover) to forward between L2 isolated hosts on the same subnet. In this case it’s a private RFC1918 subnet, but the feature is also useful to avoid waste of precious public IPv4 address space by merging several small subnets into a larger one.
I’m up this topic.
How to in routeros enable proxy_arp_pvlan in 6.6 version?
As of 6.38rc7 there is a new ARP reply option on bridges “local-proxy-arp”
This allows for PVLAN type functionality on Mikrotik bridges.