Worked as designed. Site was down earlier, but your page showed it was not just me.
Happy to help
Apparently there were some Cloudflare problems ... again ?
Maybe, but it didn't ping their load balancer but made it to Latvia.
If possible, it would be a good idea to separate the loading of the page (mikrotikstat.us) and the loading of service check results. Currently, when 12 Mikrotik services are down, the page itself (mikrotikstat.us) loads, and it appears as if it itself is down.
Page was migrated to a new host so it should be more reliable now.
The problem you’re describing shouldn’t happen either way, as the status page is completely independent from the checks it makes. Unless as mentioned above, Cloudflare is having problems.
Also the ROS archive part was removed from the page as I don’t really have time to maintain it. There’s a better place for this anyway: https://mikrotik-archive.com/
Content deleted by author.
And…?
Trolling…
Anyway… You could just put a disclamer on the bottom of the page.
Something like:
MikroTik and the MikroTik logo is a registered trademark of MikroTik ( MikroTik.com )
mikrotikstat.us has no affiliations expressed or otherwise to MikroTik ( MikroTik.com )
I would also put on the bottom of the page:
MikroTik and the MikroTik logo is a registered trademark of MikroTik ( MikroTik.com )
mikrotikstat.us has no affiliations expressed or otherwise to MikroTik ( MikroTik.com )
You should add this!
Except it's not a registerted® trademark. And it all comes under fair use.
More imporantly the logo guidelines suggest:
Unless you have an express license from MikroTik, these Guidelines will exclusively govern your use of our Brand Assets. We’re happy to have you promote your MikroTik presence and content.
But those goes on to say just:
Just make sure your ads and marketing materials don’t suggest that MikroTik is sponsoring your promotions or formally affiliated in any way.
So @cyrq seems more than adaquent. If MikroTik has specific terms, they could publish them. For example, Apple does have some exact language that should be used that they disclose. MikroTik does not, other than "don't suggest" it is from MikroTik itself.
The verbage I use is:
Not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with MikroTik [, ...]. Any trademarks and/or copyrights remain the property of their respective holders unless specifically noted otherwise. Use of a term in this work should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. Naming of particular products or brands should not be seen as endorsements. MikroTik is a trademark of Mikrotikls SIA. [... are trademarks of ...., registered in the U.S. and other countries and regions.]
Adding any other vendors, like in my case "Apple" and "macOS"
I was looking at this..
https://trademarks.justia.com/851/02/mikrotik-85102762.html
But yeah I guess that’s fine.
Content deleted by author.
Cannot say if it is out of the scope of the site, but right now a lot of people is having issues with Mikrotik sites on IPV6, while mikrotikstat.us is "All systems go":
Even if you only check on IPV4 you should point out it.
Created an incident will relevant info.