Today I tested beta version and found little bug if you click on button disable on wireless interface don’t disable interface but if you click on button X in the list thats work.
Whats is difference between station pseudobridge mode and station pseudobridge clone mode ?
I tested today in not clone mode all computers behind the bridge have some MAC adress and in clone mode all have own MAC address thats is only diffrence ?
Clone mode is become very helpfull some ISP only alow one PPPOE connection peer MAC adresse in clone mode is posible to connect all of bridged not tested yet.
hi been testing betaV3 but need to downgrade back to v2.9.35
tryed using downgrade by packages then rebooted but it still starts up
as betaV3 even did a restore from a backup still the same
Hi,
Does the 24hr trial allow for use of the wireless package? According to the chart at mikrotik it does, but I couldn’t get my WRAP.2c with bios 1.11 to either detect the SR9, or install the wireless package.
I tried installing the wireless package with netinstall when I copied the system over to the CF card. I don’t think it was installed however, and I proceeded to use the web based config to add the package. Even then, I don’t think it ever installed because it said it would reboot, and could take a few minutes, but never did. Even after 10 minutes and I power cycled the WRAP, it wouldn’t detect the SR9.
I also had problems getting Mikrotik to boot up after power cycles when the SR9 was installed. I’ll try a different SR9 tonight.
bandwidth thottling not working. either by setting in pppoe secret locally, or by sending ascend-data-rate command via radius. downgraded to 2.9.37 and it worked properly again.
not positive on this one but fw rules blocking access admin the unit seemed to be allowing access anways. downgraded to 2.9.37 and it worked properly again.
pppoe server locked up. couldn’t remove existing logged in user, nor authenticate new ones. not sure if related to the beta, or not, we’ll see if re-occurs again now that we downgraded. it has never happened prior to this.
we have not yet seen a supout.rif with 3 CPUs showing, csickles …
as far as I have seen, it always reports correctly. If linux shows incorrectly, it’s even better for us You have 2 CPUs and that’s a fact, so it shows 2 CPUs
I will drop 3 Sup Outs today for you to tear into.
1 will be from a DL140. (Single Hyper Threader)
2 will be froma a Super Micro. (Dual Hyper Threader) 1 with 3 CPUs showing and one with 4.