I have some locations where I am considering using MT AP (532v5) with maybe a dozen clients using new RB411.
If everything worked fine then I enabled nstream and polling I would assume that the clients get polled in a round-robin type fashion? Would the effects of doing this stabilize all the connections with a cost of reduced over bandwidth for any particular subscriber? Overall, I’m trying to figure out which is the best solution
Anyone who has done this can you please explain the noticable differences on the ap / clients?
Its on 2.4 so my expectations are not more than 10MB per client - the AP has a 10 MB feed I may get 8MB through max during business hours. So I’m looking at 6-8MB reality I’d like to see any subscriber each be able to get - not all at the same time obviously.
You should be able to get that without using Nstream. Personally I would setup with Nstream at first to keep latency low and enable later if it’s needed.
I think you meant to say install without nstream then add it later if needed… So your experience is that with nstream enabled latency should be less?
I’ll install without it just because it looks like I’m going to have to buy 133c boards instead of 411 boards due to them not being here quite yet. A 133c has enough to do just to run without haivng nstream enabled.
I was just thinking that with polling and csma disabled it might perform better – more like the trango gear we use most often.
