I request to Forum Admins to prohibit posting of ChatGPT scripts on the forum, without specify the source.
Why? Just today two users post help request on script maded by ChatGPT without specify that those script are generated by ChatGPT.
I’m happy to help, but what I can’t stand is wasting my time, like the other forum users.
I think that if everyone here helps others for free, at least they don’t want to be made fun of…
Wasting time correcting a script that SEEMS valid
(but it is clear that it was then written by ChatGPT that when it doesn’t know something… it invents the instructions…)
is disrespecting anyone who tries to help.
I agree. While ChatGPT is a neat tool in the toolbox, there are some things it just has no knowledge of and is a tad too confident of a liar about. for example, its great at writing Go code, but it cant write Google App Script code that does anything correct. I think it would be dangerous to leave scripts posted without the notation of the source as it would muddy up the search results coming in.
Another problem is when someone searches something on Google or on the Forum, false GPT results are provided as results,
and maybe they come first because for the search algorithm they SEEM more relevant, creating even more problems…
Unfortunately it will take some time before the general public learns to Never Ever trust ChatGPT to provide correct facts since it’s just a dumb language model without any real intelligence that only imitates your native language. Thus, before posting anything that is originated from ChatGPT you have to verify all the facts yourself.
The media is to blame for this misconception because the simplest pattern matching is called AI nowadays.
I call BS on this request.
Every tom dick and harry comes here with some stewpid config they got from youtube, dont see anybody banning that…
Just kidding, yes CONCUR, but I prefer, getting paid airfare ( just reduce Normands salary appropriately) to the location of the perp and issue me with a tazer. Thus one can verbally advise the criminal and then provide some encouragement/support!!!
Well, before doing the WISP I worked for years as a programmer, so the thinking of a programmer comes naturally to me.
I just had to adapt to the RouterOS language and create what isn’t there…
I started programming when I was a child with Assembler and CPM/86 with MSDOS 3.0 and “debug”…
Even if now I don’t remember anything about Assembler anymore…
@rextended, don’t worry the robot aren’t going to put you out of work. Imagine the goal is prevent prevent MORE work in figuring out where some cut-and-paste ChatGPT/etc script is wrong. Full support here – already a good idea to state the source of material anyway.
"With Assembler and CPM/86" ... very impressive my Italian Friend ... your RouterOS code is very nice ... but you need to make it very fast not only NICE ...
“Did you put your name into the Goblet of Fire, Harry?” he asked calmly. “Did you eat the chocolate cake, pony?” he asked calmly.
Pony answered with full mouth “No”
A thick brown liquid started dripping from a corner of pony’s mouth. “No I didn’t!” pony started crying.
This rule would be useless. If it is known that we don’t like ChatGPT, people will not admit their scripts are from there. There is no proof and it will lead only to selective punishment based on assumptions.
Some hint: completly invented instructions, like /tool fetch charset=UTF-8, 2**32 (mean 2 * 2 * 2… 32 times…), /file save name=test.txt (save what???) etc.
Mistakes are one thing, it can happen to me too…
the sensationally invented parts are one thing…
they’re so wrong, they seem real… a continuous April Fool’s
The problem isn’t the robots, it’s the stupid humans who feel relieved to learn and criticize…
To give everything as good just because a machine (with conditioned morals) says so.
