A bit offtopic, but still related.
cAP AC speed is like a lottery, every test gives diffrent result but as we all know globally it is and it will be always very slow.
Recently I tested Huawei AX3 and Asus RT-AX55 WiFi6 routers. As at the moment I have none AX devices (but for the future AX support would be nice to have), I disabled AX mode in both WiFi6 routers, but despite their big antennas, the 2,4Ghz speed was low (still twice better than MT -s) and coverage was terrible.
I also tested Cudy WR2100 and TP-Link C80 WiFi5 routers. Cudy WR2100 is OpenWrt based/supported, but again low (still twice better than MT -s) 2,4Ghz speed and coverage. TP-Link C80 was the best, strong 2,4Ghz signal, good speed, good coverage, however it had connection issues (after some time router loosed connection and crashed). Their support (they actually have such one, unlike MT -s support, who bury his head under the sand) contacted me, made tests, and provide beta firmware, which fixed issues, but still at the moment there is impossible to disable onemesh (may be available in the future).
When TP-Link 80 coverage was the best, strangely cAP AC coverage is almost same, while in the area, where TP-Link C80 had full bars, Huawei and Asus lost signal completely.
As all new TP-Link AX devices are having issues with 2,4Ghz and I don’t want to set up mesh network, I’m looking for a powerful WiFi device and as You praise TP-Link EAP245 a lot, I may get it and use with cAP AC (as router only), but please tell how good/bad it’s coverage and 2,4Ghz speed is compared to some other models.