Just today - I don't think I've ever seen messages like this - a RouterOS 7.23 stable system logged the following:
2026-05-28 12:01:01 ssld,error ssl: record overflow
2026-05-28 12:38:00 ssld,error ssl: no common ciphers
2026-05-28 16:43:57 ssld,error ssl: peer suggested unsupported TLS version
2026-05-28 18:43:22 ssld,error ssl: peer suggested unsupported TLS version
2026-05-28 18:43:55 ssld,error ssl: peer suggested unsupported TLS version
2026-05-28 18:44:28 ssld,error ssl: peer suggested unsupported TLS version
2026-05-28 18:44:28 ssld,error ssl: no common ciphers
2026-05-28 18:45:34 ssld,error ssl: no common ciphers
2026-05-28 18:46:07 ssld,error ssl: no common ciphers
2026-05-28 18:46:07 ssld,error ssl: peer suggested unsupported TLS version
2026-05-28 18:49:16 ssld,error ssl: peer suggested unsupported TLS version
2026-05-28 18:49:48 ssld,error ssl: no common ciphers
2026-05-28 18:49:49 ssld,error ssl: peer suggested unsupported TLS version
2026-05-28 20:00:37 ssld,error ssl: no common ciphers
2026-05-28 20:00:38 ssld,error ssl: peer suggested unsupported TLS version
The only thing open to the Internet is an SSTP server, and I don't see SSTP errors in the log around the time of these various ssld errors.
Searching, I don't find much at all (in the forum, or on the Internet in general) about these messages.
I assume - someone please correct me - that the RouterOS ssld is an underlying service which receives SSL/TLS connections for all RouterOS services which need to deal with SSL/TLS connections, and hands off the connection to the higher level service after successfull SSL/TLS session negotiation?
Is there a way to get the "ssld" to give some context for the connections that produce errors like these?
Almost without doubt, these are probes/attacks. The hope is that MikroTik's SSL implementation has no presently exploitable bugs...
This logging is new; the attacks certainly are not new. So, we're now aware of it, but they've been there always.
Still, these log entries need to provide more/useful information. I opened a support case with MikroTik about this fact; their answer:
We have forwarded the relevant information to our development team for review.
Unfortunately I cannot provide any guarantees of implementation or any clear ETAs.
@libove We would be very grateful if you could share the information you received with us, as these numerous error entries are becoming extremely annoying.