Sorry, I am not good at english.
This is my problem:
I creat a super simple TREE QUEUE, it inclued two leaves (leaf1/leaf2) only.
When leaf2 need , i want leaf2 can use all bandwidth of my RouterOs.
When leaf2 don’t need , leaf1 can use all bandwidth that leaf2 not use.
This is my rules(RouterOs is a masquerade server):
[admin@MikroTik] ip firewall mangle> pri
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
0 chain=forward dst-address=222.83.1.36 action=mark-packet
new-packet-mark=leaf1 passthrough=yes
When I download from 61.152.235.19 and 222.83.1.36 at the same time, I found leaf2 always share half of totoal bandwidth to leaf1 .
I set leaf2’s priority=1, want leaf2 can use all of bandwidth , why leaf2 can’t use all of bandwidth , where is wrong?
Some tips…
1-You should mangle in prerounting chain… not forward
2-Youre using “passthrough=yes”
3-READ THE MANUAL, WIKI and PLEASE search the forums, BEFORE asking…
Some tips…
1-You should mangle in prerounting chain… not forward
2-Youre using “passthrough=yes”
3-READ THE MANUAL, WIKI and PLEASE search the forums, BEFORE asking…
Thanks for reply!
1-You should mangle in prerounting chain… not forward
try it, but no efect
2-Youre using “passthrough=yes”
try it, but no efect
3-READ THE MANUAL, WIKI and PLEASE search the forums, BEFORE
I aready read the manual and search the forums, but …
Please tell me how to resolve this problem directly, thanks again!
Hi SmartBoy, your repeated ask for help is not smart, you know? - you seem to be desperate, right?
Well, I am not the one skilled here on the forum, but, as another poster suggested:
Try to mark in prerouting instead of forward
I can see you mark packet twice, why? Why do you mark twice for the same destination address? If you are not using Simple queue, theoretically marking in forward should be enough, but try following:
Thanks for reply, again.
After i have readed manual carefully and try it again and again , I feel desperate really .
why traffic priority can’t work correct?
I suggest the author of RouterOS manual to test what he wrote again! Follow the manual , the trafic prioriy of tree queue can’t work correct.