I have LHGG LTE US kit trunk to an hAP ac2 router it works great and i can concur that the switch chip is happily working on the hAP ac2 side, but i'm having difficulty on wrapping my head to add wlan1 and wlan2 interface on the VLAN-BR on hAP ac2, I tried that but it doesn't work as i expected.
So I made a workaround since ether3 is an access port on my router, I create a separate bridge called Wireless and add ether4 + wlan1 + wlan2 in the bridge and put a physical cable on ether4 plug in on ether3 on the same device just to achieve what I want and presto I was able to connect to my AP and have an internet access.
My question is there a way to achieved my goal without wasting 1 physical port? actually the side effect of what I did is basically hw offload still works because I don't put the wlan1 and wlan2 on the VLAN-BR but still i'm still interested to know how can I achieved my goal not to waste a precious port, thanks in advance guys!
From the explanation I fail to see what exactly is the problem wiith wlan1 and wlan2. It seems you’d like to have wlan1 and wlan2 set as access ports to VLAN 20? You can achieve that by setting vlan-mode=use-tag vlan-id=20 on wlan1 and wlan2 interfaces while adding those as ports of bridge VLAN-BR.
I follow your suggestion and tweak a bit the config to be much more elaborate but i'm still missing something, on port ether2 and ether3 I can get an IP from my DHCP server on LHGG
it's just the wlan1 and wlan2 i can't get an IP
wlan1 i should get an IP address of 192.168.98.x and 192.168.99.x on wlan2 but i can't figure out why it's not working :), thanks man i hope you might have some ideas
You started to mix in bridge vlan-filtering … which should not be used together with switch-chip vlan setup.
First decide which way you want to do and then we’ll help you. BTW, my post #2 above was based on switch-chip vlans (since you had that in your original post). It does not apply (directly) to your current setup.
Thanks for confirming my theory that they can not co-exist together, I decided on the switch chip route approach at least on this router and stay with my original hack
Your input is very valuable to restore my sanity and thank you so much for your effort and time, for switching I might stay on cisco and juniper for the time being but I’m pretty sold in mikrotik router line of product at least, quite an adventure see you again in another post