A device has NOT an IP address, one (or more) interfaces on it may have one.
Both the devices you posted the configuration of have the IP addresses assigned to ether1 ONLY, respectively 192.168.2.26 and 192.168.2.25.
BUT in both devices the ether1 is INSIDE a bridge.
On first device on the same bridge there is also the interface wlan60-1 (correct).
On the second there is NOT any other interface but ether1, you need to add one (it is not clear to me, since you have both a wlan60-1 and a wlan60-station-1 interfaces, what the intended role of the device is).
But a bridge with only one interface tends to produce “the sound of one hand”.
You should assign the IP to the bridge (and NOT to an interface in it).
You have to think that a bridge is like BORG:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg
the biological and technological distinctiveness of ether1 and wlan60-1 are now part of the bridge.
So. since these two entities (ether1 and wlan-60-1) are now merged into a single one (the bridge) this:
makes little sense, and - see earlier post - the bridge, which is the collective, should be added as LAN.
Then, on the second device you have internet detect enabled, see Rule #5: