I realize there are many radius options available besides Mikrotik’s userman, and that dedicated Intel based machines can be setup to run Mikrotik with higher per core clock speeds.
However, it would be nice if the could modify the code to simply utilize the massive multi-core processing horsepower available with routers they are touting now. Below is an example of what I am seeing:
I am looking in the profile info for that core and ~70% is ate up with “flash” and 30% for “User-Manager”. Although it does need better multi-core support, I’d be interested to know the performance specs on the integrated 512MB NAND storage. I’m using a tiny fraction of the available 512MB currently. Ether beefing up the onboard NAND or a card reader/USB 3.0/SATA with some of the new flash technology could beef up storage IOPS substantially. Some low cost Flash drives on the market now support in excess of 100,000 IOPS. On that note, is TRIM supported in RouterOS?
Hmmm, still can’t access userman web interface and it looks like a autosupout.rif was generated around the time this happened. In general userman is choking harder now than ever, possibly for aforementioned reasons and stepping up on hardware typically improved performance for awhile until customer load increased to the point where userman was unusable.
Our dedicated userman device history includes Cloudcore, the 1100AHx2, and the original 1100 through many iterations of RouterOS.
There is no such data can provide, but the bias of the Core often occurs in the following equipment to own me.
This Will a matter of rOS?
CCR1016-12G
As you can see in the picture CCR1016-12G currently running ROS 6.3, however, I’ve seen this issue through many versions of ROS in 5.X and 6.X.