RouterOS version 6.48.2 has been released in public “stable” channel! Before an upgrade: Remember to make backup/export files before an upgrade and save them on another storage device; Make sure the device will not lose power during upgrade process; Device has enough free storage space for all Ro…

Port forwarding stop working. Downgrading to 6.47.8 all works fine. This has to be a config error at you site. It works fine. Post you config. I run flawless years now with the same config… and now works only the “hamachi desktop” rule when i set it to enable to that specific pc. The ham…

This is just part of the config and it looks ok. To see what the problem is we need the rest. Post output of /export hide-sensitive and use code tags </> If it was broken, you would have seen hundreds of post complaining about it’s not working. For Torrent, you can do a test using UPnP instead…

and why do you use in-interface**-list**; do you have multiple wan connections? are the correct interfaces added to that list? Do you have mangle rules that make sure packets leave on the same interface they came in?

So here it is then… and i saw in first posts someone else also who wrote that PF is not working, if im not wrong. /interface bridge add name=Bridge add disabled=yes name=Bridge_Guest /interface ethernet set [ find default-name=ether1 ] l2mtu=1598 name=WAN1 set [ find default-name=eth…

/ip route add distance=1 gateway=1.0.0.1 routing-mark=to_WAN2 add distance=2 gateway=1.1.1.1 routing-mark=to_WAN2 add distance=1 gateway=1.1.1.1 routing-mark=to_WAN1 add distance=2 gateway=1.0.0.1 routing-mark=to_WAN1 add check-gateway=ping distance=1 gateway=1.1.1.1 add check-gateway=ping distance=…

your default routes are wrong, you are using cloudflare's dns servers as your next hop.. Is like incomplete or erroneous implementation of this: [image] Advanced Routing Failover without Scripting Useful user articles _A comment about PPP uplinks (like PPP…

Why do you use these weird mtu sizes on ether2&3? Because on CRS109-8G-1S-2HnD-IN mtu can be set to 4064 and the think is: bigger the MTU, bigger the speed...

Because on CRS109-8G-1S-2HnD-IN mtu can be set to 4064 and the think is: bigger the MTU, bigger the speed... That is actually correct, but of course it will only work when you can increase the MTU over the entire path between systems. So in practice it is only useful to do this in a local netw…

Because on CRS109-8G-1S-2HnD-IN mtu can be set to 4064 and the think is: bigger the MTU, bigger the speed... That is actually correct, but of course it will only work when you can increase the MTU over the entire path between systems. So in practice it is only useful to do this in a local ne…

Before i write that i found the issue and it was not the mikrotik router, i would like to say that i have the crs109 behind 2 nated provider’s modem dsl-routers on giga ports and thats why the high MTU. Now for the routing rules, they r the only ones that work and i have failover. The method that is…

v6.48.2 [stable] is released!

Announcements

rextended May 14, 2021, 8:24am 128

Is like incomplete or erroneous implementation of this: