UPnP Service crashes after a few Minutes on my CCR1036-8G-2S+
Only a Reboot helps.
Router is not discoverable by upnp clients.
Have this Problem on LongTerm 7.1 and Stable 7.1.3
Where do all these problems come from, what is happening? there has never been a problem with version 6. I’m afraid to update other devices because they may not start.
Does v7.1.3 give us working IPSec site-to-site tunneling between two ROS 7 devices?
Previous v7 releases stop routing traffic between two ROS7 devices after 10-15 seconds of establishing site-to-site tunnel. Tunnels work if either end is v6.x device though.
Quite accurate description. Upgrading from 6.x to 7.x is an experiment that I would not risk in a production environment. We use Mikrotik routers since more than a decade in an amateur radio envorinment at https://hamnetdb.net/?m=as&q=db0hup and even there we will not upgrade to 7.x. I haven’t seen such a mess with upgrading before, not exactly a success story.
Yesterday I upgraded RB3011 from 7.1.2 to 7.1.3 and it also ended to boot loop. Not sure which firmware there was installed, but in serial port console it was saying version “7”. After netinstall I also updated firmware to 7.1.3 and it also shows version “7.1.3” on serial port console. So could this version “7” firmware cause the problem?
Upgraded my RB951G-2HnD, RB2011UiAS-iN, RB3011UiAS-RM, RB1100AHx4 and hAP AC to RouterOS v7.1.3… So far, no issues. Also, didn’t have any issues with v7.1, v7.1.1 and v7.1.2
I see that blackhole routes in the main table can be used to allow BGP to announce networks in bgp-networks list. Is that the best way so far or are there other ways or one that is less cumbersome? Any downsides to using BH routes to accomplish this?
That is an interesting suggestion… that could be a workaround for us as well (we use aggregation for a large number of tunnels terminated at a single router).
At the moment v7 does not support aggregation, and worse: it also does not corectly handle the forwarding of aggregated routes originating from a v6 router further downstream.
But just advertising a dummy blackhole route should be possible…
In other use cases, maybe not.