v7.1 is released!

Version 7.1 has been released.

Spanish: https://youtu.be/fzLxTl6VXRI
English: https://youtu.be/Zp-U7Anv5-0
Russian: https://youtu.be/xRGBbXJc1xA

PDF information: https://mt.lv/RouterOSv7

Before an upgrade:

  1. Remember to make backup/export files before an upgrade and save them on another storage device;
  2. Make sure the device will not lose power during upgrade process;
  3. Device has enough free storage space for all RouterOS packages to be downloaded.

What's new in 7.1 (2021-Dec-01 16:07):

MAJOR CHANGES

!) updated Linux Kernel based on version 5.6.3;
!) completely new NTP client and server implementation;
!) completely new User Manager implementation;
!) merged individual packages, only bundle and a few extra packages remain;
!) new Command Line Interface (CLI) style (RouterOS v6 commands are still supported);
!) support for Let's Encrypt certificate generation;
!) support for REST API;
!) support for UEFI boot mode on x86;

NETWORKING

!) CHR FastPath support for "vmxnet3" and "virtio-net" drivers;
!) support for "Cake" and "FQ_Codel" type queues;
!) support for IPv6 NAT;
!) support for Layer 3 hardware acceleration on all CRS3xx devices;
!) support for MBIM driver with basic functionality support for all modems with MBIM mode;
!) support for MLAG on CRS3xx devices;
!) support for VRRP grouping and connection tracking data synchronization between nodes;
!) support for Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN);

ROUTING

!) completely new BGP implementation with performance improvements;
!) completely new IPv6 stack;
!) completely new MPLS implementation with interface lists, multipath and LDPv6 support;
!) completely new OSPF implementation with performance improvements;
!) completely new routing filtering with script-like rule syntax, RPKI support and large and extended community filtering;
!) support for IPv6 ECMP and VRF (including VRF-lite);
!) support for IPv6 recursive routing and policy routing;

VPN

!) support for L2TPv3;
!) support for OpenVPN UDP transport protocol;
!) support for WireGuard;
!) support for ZeroTier on ARM and ARM64 devices;

WIRELESS

!) completely new alternative wireless package "wifiwave2" with 802.11ac Wave2, WPA3 and 802.11w management frame protection support (requires ARM CPU and 256MB RAM);

Full changelog is available here: https://mikrotik.com/download/changelogs/testing-release-tree

Changelog since 7.1rc7?

!) completely new alternative wireless package “wifiwave2” with 802.11ac Wave2, WPA3 and 802.11w management frame protection support (> requires ARM CPU and > 256MB RAM> );

Quite a lot of devices will lack new stack.

Yep, it is a shame, but at the same time understandable.

[quote=strods post_id=894500 time=1638446386 user_id=72415]
Due to the fact that we have made a huge progress in RouterOS v7 stability, we have decided to release it in the testing channel.
[/quote]
Ok so this is basically 7.1rc7 with a new version number? No need to install it when you already have 7.1rc7?

[quote]Please test it where you can and report your feedback on this forum page[/quote]
Did you read all feedback on the previous v7.1rc forum pages and at least put the remarks about lacking or nonworking sub-features on a work-to-do list?
[quote]ROUTING

----------------------

!) completely new BGP implementation with performance improvements;[/quote]
that looks exciting but unfortunately there are some critical omissions in the current status that make it unfit for production use.

and we all know that until it is fit for production use, it cannot really be tested either.

I have a RB4011 which fulfills the requirements for wifiwave2 but still I cannot use it because it doesn’t co-exist with the normal package that is required to support 2.4 GHz WiFi.
Or did that change?

Capsman Support in wifiwave2?

what about the MPLS module, is it stable?

CAPsMAN does not support WW2 at the moment.
Note that WW2 is planned for future devices, that’s why there are additional requirements in terms of hardware.

What I said on the 7.1rc7 topic (http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/v7-1rc7-development-is-released/153617/1), still valid, the RB4011 switch is still useless.
I’m wondering if the wireguard peer IPv6 bug is still present, probably yes, as Mikrotik even did not acknowledged it …

Edit: wireguard still broken.

What about the cAP XL ac, it was lauched months ago, after the wifiwave2 was around?

About the useless switch of the RB4011, here are the tests showing that the issue isn’t solved.

With bridge vlan filtering on:
Screenshot 2021-12-02 133319.png
With bridge vlan filtering off:
Screenshot 2021-12-02 133101.png

v7.1 contains routing fixes and improvements in order to fully comply with 6.x setups.

In other words, the 7.1 is a exact copy (as there is changelog between) of 7.1rc7, as the same well reported bugs are still here…

Please give us more detailed changelogs, even if it only says briefly like you wrote now, if we have related issue, we than know to flash new version and check if issue is resolved..

no, like Sergejs clearly wrote, it contains several routing fixes, compared to rc7

IPv6 NAT / netmap (WinBox / WebFig) missing fields:
7.1 IPv6 NAT netmap.PNG
WireGuard, broken IPv6 in allowed-address for peers.

/interface/wireguard/peers/print 
# INTERFACE   PUBLIC-KEY             ENDPOINT-PORT  ALLOWED-ADDRESS                
0 wireguard1  editedpubkeypeer0=                 0  172.22.88.12/32                
                                                    edited:7:0:12/128
1 wireguard1  editedpubkeypeer1=                 0  172.22.88.13/32                
                                                    edited:7:0:13/128



ping edited:7:0:12
    0 edited:7:0:12                56  64 90ms951us  echo reply



ping edited:7:0:13
    0 edited:7:0:12               104  64 75ms476us  net unreachable

reply from :12 ? um..

/interface/wireguard/peers> enable 1



ping edited:7:0:12
    0 edited:7:0:12                                  timeout



ping edited:7:0:13
    0 edited:7:0:13                56 128 10ms730us  echo reply

Also allowed-address “::/0” cannot be set from WinBox, it doesn’t get saved. It works from CLI only.
I know I’ve written all this in the support ticket regarding WireGuard, but others might wanna know about the issue.
And yes @soheilsh, socks5 is still broken.

I think that everyone would be happy to have, somewhere the full changelog, because sometimes, there is some “edge-case” that may affect someone and that person could see if this was solved…

http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/crs317-l3hw-firewall-question/150635/1


Long story short, L3 Fastpath (FastTrack) support for vlan-filtered bridges is in development. It is a new feature, not a bug. While we understand your frustration, please consider that new features cannot be added during the stabilization phase of the project. We are hoping to deliver this feature in the upcoming v7 versions.

Do I need to mention outpu.network in bgp if I use out filter?