Same with beta 9, getting SA query timeouts and roaming fails on a late model iPad Air and a laptop with an AX200 that worked and roamed with no problems on previous versions.The iPad started asking for the password again and it kept being rejected until I forgot the network, powered the iPad off and on and rejoined. Using a 5009 with 2x hAPAX^2. I suspect the “*) wifi-qcom - updated driver;” is the culprit. A bit late in the beta cycle to be dropping in newer drivers.
LOL? Seems not to be easy for MT. add drivers in a testing release: people moan. Exchange drivers in beta (!) release: people moan. Exchange drivers at all: people moan.
We seem to be having issues with BGP with this version. I really don’t have a baseline to go off of, except 7.14.2 seems to be working.
In one case, I have two ospf advertise default routes from two routers pointed towards a FW. That firewall only shows one default route. Shouldn’t it show both, but then have one that is active and the other that is not??
We have had issues with our bgp filters seem to not either work. Or not show our advertised routes in rout bgp ad print commands..
Just random things when working with new bgp servers. It seems wonky, and doesn’t “act” like we think it should when doing commands. Like I’m not showing advertisements, but the peer is seeing them at times.
I’m talking about the router that is receiving from two routers sending originate default. It would be the router choosing which one to pick that doesn’t show both routers. Wouldn’t it be an eigrp situation then? Or at least show both defaults and then have picked one in its table??
ehm.. you mean ECMP, it can be but only if the two routes have the same cost (to reach both devices advertising the default).
And yes, you should see at least one of them in the routing table (as long as you do not have another better default from another source, or you are filtering it).
Yes, ECMP lol..
These other two routers are directly connected to the 3 that is getting the defaults from the other two. So, should be the same cost(s) I do see them both in the OSPF LSA table. So, the router is getting both. I just find it odd that the main table doesn’t show both, and that it’s choosing one over the other in there. ie not listing both, and then showing one as active and the other not.. No filters enabled on OSPF.
We still had some weirdness with bgp and the router not showing advertised routes. Or even showing routes in the main table.. So, while I can’t quite prove my “feelings” here. Some things seem weird, and we went back to the stable for a working config.
I’m assuming it is only showing the installed routes in the routing table, OSPF will release the inactive route when it becomes active. Less items in the routing table result in faster speeds.
It can, and shows routes in the main FIB for multiple devices just fine.. It even shows routes for ECMP that aren’t default originates just fine in the proper way as well.. Just not two default originate routes in the main fib properly.. It only shows the one that it picked. So, it gets confusing. You aren’t sure if you are getting both routes until you check LSA’s
I could be wrong…
But ECMP is not a RIB thing, but a FIB thing.
I don’t know what this is like in the MikroTik world, but you can have ECMP even with static routes.
But in general, talking about ECMP without talking about TE, and especially without RSVP, doesn’t make much sense.
Any chance we could please fix DHCP snooping please?
CRS devices (CRS112-8P-4S, CRS328-24P-4S+, CRS326-24G-2S+ and CRS354-4S±2Q+) drop DHCP requests when we enable dhcp snooping and there are VLANs configured. Yes, the ‘trusted=yes’ is correct set on the uplink port.