Is there any problem in the firmware with vlan filtering per bridge?
Mikrotik 4011 os 7.5
I would like one of the vlans to be available on both the router and the connected switch ports
when I turn on
add ingress-filtering = no name = bridge1 vlan-filtering = yes
the vlan port on the router on the switch is not working
when I turn off
add name = bridge1
works on switch and vlan does not work on router
Which vlan did you want the RB4011 CPU (routing engine) to see? You stated one, but you have two vlan interfaces defined.
For each /interface vlan that is “under” the bridge (that’s what creates the interface for the router engine to associate an ip address with, and an associated tagged connection to the internal trunk link to the bridge/switch), you also need a corresponding /interface bridge vlan statement (this configures the vlan membership and tagging of the layer 2 ports on the layer 2 bridge/switch, including the layer 2 port connected to the “internal trunk link” between the routing engine and the layer 2 bridge/switch)
Each bridge “port” (e.g. ether2, or bridge1) should only have a single vlan untagged. Otherwise it would be ambiguous what vlan an untagged frame belongs to. Also both ends of a hybrid trunk link need to agree on what vlan untagged ethernet frames should be classified into. Otherwise you will get unintentional vlan hopping (what cisco routers with cdp enabled will report as Native VLAN mismatch). See this for more info.