Those that stick with MT may be able to use the latest WB without a crash with this device! The rest of us will have to switch to more trustful vendors.
We will order few more CHR licenses to serve us until we switch to a stable OS for our routing. Having a number of CCR2004s idle is more than enough reason to skip the next models^H^H^H^H^H^Hpre-production releases.
IMO Mikrotik should only target the SOHO market for at least couple of years. Lets face it - their software is not stable enough for the businesses that need 100G and/or stability.
Its a shame for MT to release more prealpha-OS-only devices instead of fixing the mess they created!
We are using some CCR2004 for peering at some IXPs und also for our upstream connectivity. So they have to handle multiple full tables (850.000 IPv4 and 150.000 IPv6). I’ve seen Janis video about the CCR2216 and there it is said it can handel HW offloading for L3 IP routing. But it says only IPv4 and only 80K to 120K routes. What can I expect how the router behaves if I have a routing table with 850k IPv4 and 150K IPv6? Will it route some packets with HW offloading and the other have to travel through CPU?
This this is gonna ROCK! The Marvell Prestera-DX8525 is a beast 24x25Gb Lanes wowzah, configured for 100Gbps to the CPU makes this thing is an absolute MONSTER! This CCR will dominate all other Mikrotik CCR routers ever made. Can’t wait to get my hands on one these. Can you say 100Gbps between core nodes for a backbone WOW!!
Precisely for that reason. You want ROS and only ROS on that NAND. At most, you want the critical logs on it. So long as you don’t tire out the NAND with unneeded write cycles.
In a way, Mikrotik are saving us from our own insanity here
That pair of M.2 fits perfectly for your Dude, container, Proxy and whatnot storage needs.