posts not strictly related to: v7.4beta [testing]

RouterOS RouterOS beta
1

On the spirit of adding controversial IPV6 functionality, can we have DHCPV6 address (/128) delegation? :slight_smile:

2

Any chance for NDP proxy?

3

Each and every time when ever a new Upgarde is Posted I use to go and check for one Important New Feature which we all ISPā€™s are waiting from Many Yearsā€¦

ā€œIPv6 PD accounting Parameter in PPP radius Accounting Packetā€

This one feature is stopping all ISP and Major Orgainisation from implementing IPv6 in their Infrastructure.

Happy to see Mikrotik Team is working Really Hard in Devloping and Fixing New Ultimate V7.x OS but my question is Many of us in this forum is already Requesting for this One Little Fix/Feature/Parameter and still now its is not even consided at all.

I Hope Mikrotik Team may Look into this Issue and Give us some Solution to it.

Thanks in Advance Team Mikrotik

4

If you donā€™t see it in the changelog, why do you bitch about it in every release topic?
Make a proper feature request.

5

FYI Already A Feature Request is made on thisā€¦ for which we have not received any Reponse from Mikrotik Team

This is a Open Forum and Posting a Issue here (impacting many Mikrotik Users) why it bothers you this muchā€¦!

6

ā€œPlease keep this forum topic strictly related to this particular RouterOS release.ā€
If you donā€™t read what they write, why should they read what you write?

7

Znevna: +1 Karma

8

Please keep this forum topic strictly related to this particular RouterOS release.

9

Sure I Will Agree on This :smiley:

10

My highest priority request is: achieve feature parity with v6.
I mean: go along every feature of v6, check if it is implemented in v7 and working, if not implement or fix it. Or in cases where that is absolutely impossible, document that it will no longer be available in a ā€œdifferences between v6 and v7ā€ document.
Only after that job is complete, start working on new features or extending other features that have been added in v7.

11

If the user read the whole topic to see if someone has already asked or reported the same thing,
instead of making another post virtually identical, there will probably be no errors and everything would be more readable ā€¦

12

(Thanks @Znevna also for other past reports)

13

If only MikroTik team would fix reported bugs as fast as you take action in the forums.

14

If the user read the whole topic to see if someone has already asked or reported the same thing,
instead of making another post virtually identical, there will probably be no errors and everything would be more readable ā€¦

Nope, the user is not exepcted to read the whole topic for a (beta) release quickly growing to more than 100 messages just to be lectored by you based on your personal preference.
The user would be expected to read a list of known and confirmed issues for a release. If such a thing would exist.

15

ĀÆ_(惄)_/ĀÆ

If the users instead to submit problems to support@mikrotilk.com do a mess on user forum,
do they really expect that in that ā€œslaughterhouseā€ we will understand something and someone will solve the problem?

16

I think there is some understanding and expectation that mentioning a problem in the release topic (especially shortly after release) will be noticed by developers and put on a list of things to do.
Sometimes there are replies indicating that this was done, but also it often happens that later it is claimed that it was never reported.

17

If the users instead to submit problems to > support@mikrotilk.com > do a mess on user forum

So reporting the same issue over and over to support is better than reporting the same issue again in the forum?
And why is MT support telling me to report issues with betas in the forum?
And how does it come you feel to be in a position telling poeple testing betas for free on how to report things for free?

Just bacause you obviously have time to hang around in forums the whole day does not mean other poeple do not have some real work to do beside fighting with what MT likes to call beta or stable.
If you really are representing MT (what I hope not considering your rude tone), this explains a lot.

18

@pe1chl
Really, I hope also thatā€¦ :sad_but_relieved_face:

@jbl42
Not, Iā€™m only a Moderator, not an Administrator or member of MikroTik Staff
Really very kind, about the rude tone, anyway in a ā€œslaughterhouseā€ nobody understands anything.

19

IMHO, forums are far too unstructured to be utilized as a serious bug reporting tool and are only slightly better than email lists.

Come on MT, you can to do better than this! You where able to fix the help site, so why not fix this as well. Btw, why not just use gitbub?

20

gitbub?
https://github.com/GitBub

:laughing: