Having wifiwave2 is definitely possible on a 16MB memory device. Like you said, they just have to separate each drivers for each chipsets.
I run OpenWRT to have wifiwave2 on 3 devices at home (Cap AC). I get 500 mbit/sec on my MacBook running iperf3. But most importantly I get fast roaming on my phone. It fast roams on the same AP between 2 and 5 ghz or across all 3 Cap ACs when I move. I can run an iperf3 test and move around without the connection ever failing. No need to play anymore with the tx power or having to tweak anything.
You’re nitpicking, aren’t you? Linux kernel usually doesn’t just “invent” otherwise non-existing CPU cores. So if at some certain point linux kernel in ROS v7 showed 2 CPU cores, this pretty much testifies that SoC includes two CPU cores. Why propaganda materials from different vendors doesn’t mention it? Could be that also linux kernel, used by other vendors (many do, you know?), doesn’t support multiple cores. Could be that other vendors found out about problems earlier and already implemented workaround (of disabling second core). Could be that other vendors actually enable both cores but their UI doesn’t go into trouble of showing that. Could be anything else.
Sadly Marvell seems to hide spec sheets for their SoCs from general public so we can’t verify.
There is an "other files" options, but how to use that to replace user mgr graphics, I dunno. But if Branding Kit didn't replace all the logos, that seems like a bug.
Is false… I use branding and do not “let you replace any file”.
At least you add your own graphics for webpage, but not for webfig, only a small logo.
And about branding folder is for add script and other files used internally on device,
but you still unable to REPLACE any existing file (or add hidden executable file)…
I wasn't arguing. It was originally a suggestion that "should be possible" [theoritically]. e.g. "if Branding Kit didn't replace all the logos, some way, that seems like a bug."
The better question is does Mikrotik consider something like this a bug? e.g. should the OP should have just filed a report at help.mikrotik.com and have hope it be fixed? Or does Mikrotik track issues/requests like that from this forum, so filing a bug report duplicative?
Or even better: could you work on BGP? BGP seems to be at a standstill, even though this is the major area of feature incompleteness in v7 relative to v6.
Latest beta doesn’t play nice with wifiwave2 drivers. After update to 7.4beta4 the wifi interfaces don’t work anymore on Hap AC3
In winbox it displays an extra option above mode named master interface with unknown status which is unselectable & also the mac-address of the wifi card appears as 00:00:00:00:00:00. Tried to reset the interface but to no avail. Back to 7.3.1 until is fixed
Would it be possible to create new topic for each beta ? or AT THE VERY LEAST update the first post to include ALL the changelogs ?
Thanks you very much in advance !
