Is there any plans on supporting Speedify WAN bonding? I would really like this implemented into routerOS some how. I have mulitiple 4g LTE WANs and would love to be able to access this as a feature. Speedify has now released a linux Distribution for x86_64 and ARM/ARM64. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_Jo9RZrf5I
Thanks,
Yet another VPN provider…
What is “Speedify”? round-robin bonded openvpn-tunnels?
I dont think its a round robin approach or a load balancing vpn. It works at the packet level to bond two WAN connections into a single fat pipe. Their is some speed loss associated with it, example two 100mbps don’t quite equal 200mbps more like 180mbsp but it is a great solution vs mushroom networks or peplink speedfusion bonding which could reach into the thousands for their routers and not to mention the cost of their cloud bonding solutions. Not to Mention that it is a very elegant solution vs trying to set up another server in the cloud and creating a bonded vpn tunnel. Need a wife and kids approved solution if you know what i mean.
I second this. Perhaps if Speedify just creates the configuration script needed..
For me will be better if Mikrotik implement SD WAN, is the same what Mikrotik have now with PCC, but a simple way of configuration!
Then go and start your own thread and ask for it, this is for Multi-WAN Bonding, and specifically for Speedify 
That would be great, we would love to an integration as well
Agreed. I don’t think mikrotik should be adding additional code to support fringe implementations at this stage (or if ever). There is so much work to do on core functionality first. If it can be implemented within the current functionality through some clever/complex configuration by all means lets have at it. But if it means adding more lines of code to ROS that just means more bugs, and there are enough of them already.
It’s a router not a General population OS that you can install what you like into.
Keep it simple and do what they should be doing best Routing
Reviving this thread. Is there anything similar to PepLink’s SpeedFusion for Mikrotik? It can be speedify, a generic SD-WAN solution or whatever. The only reason I keep a Peplink router is to use SpeedFusion over multiple LTE links. Being able to do this on Mikrotik, would be a gigantic win and a good revenue source for Mikrotik since this is inherently a subscription service.
I’m just here to say… +1
…
I’m also looking for a better alternative to Peplink Speedfusion or OpenMPTCPRouter.
Especially one where I don’t have to provide my own VPS on the other side, and where the connection can be encrypted with OpenVPN or WireGuard.
That’s actually the only reason why I created an account for this forum.
At Oracle Cloud you can run a VPS at ARM for free with decent parameters. New ros7.1 give us new option to do that. I hope this can be possible all to finish your idea.
They put Zerotier on the routers… why not a package to support speedify?
I have been emailing with speedify.
They have a VPN set up where they send packets over MULTIPLE CHANNELS AT ONCE. These packets are assembled at a VPS that should be nearby. Then sent on to final destination.
The reverse is true when packets come back.
So yes… it can “Go faster” than one of your single services.
Your servers will use the IP address of the VPS.
When one ISP goes down, the connection to the VPS does not change IPs or break. It slows. This keeps connections from breaking.
Using Bigleaf for this costs several hundred dollars a month.
Speedify can do it on the device for a couple of bucks.
If I could put this INFRONT of my routers… this would be awesome. Plus a whole lot cheaper than BigLeaf.
Hey gotsprings, I think you can run speedify on a rasp pi…
I saw that. But then you are playing with a device that doesn’t even have the proper ethernet jacks.
Plus… where could you get a Pi these days?
I wonder if I could use an old RB??? hmmm.
So, I did this as a test using an Intel NUC with a couple of 4G and 5G links, and it “works” in that you have an internet connection. Whatever you hand off to will have an internal IP, and even the NUC on the Speedify side has an internal IP. With the standard package, there is no port forwarding, no IPv6 (from the last time I checked) and the max speed is a 1Gb link shared with other users. You can get a “Dedicated Server”, which looks to be a VPS, for around 120 per month extra, which is also limited to 1Gb/s and has a 3TB bandwidth cap but does support static IPs and port forwarding… Ideally, if they offered the software for you to install on your instance and added IPv6 support, with, maybe, the option of routing IPs through the network, that would be handy. Another option would be to have Zerotier on your Mikrotik, then speedily in front. Route your static IP (v4 and/or v6) over Zerotier and happy days. Even better would be Zerotier supporting FULL load balancing…
The dedicated server… Provides for a public IP address and the ability to port forward.
That’s 240 bucks a month in BigLeaf.
Closer to $83 in Speedify.